On 07/07/2017 02:04 AM, William Brown
wrote:
yes, as I said before this will work, but it is the intended bind. We should not push to just use "cn=directory manager" just because it works. If they have an external application like "cyberoam" (whatever this is (kind of access manager?)), i would really recommend NOT to let it use "cn=directory manager"On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 14:35 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:dn="Directory Manager,dc=text,dc=in" is not a valid dn (err=34) the attribute for "directory manager" is missing. you need to verify what is teh proper dn, most likely: "cn=directory Manager,dc=text,dc=in" but you have to make sure this entry exists On 07/06/2017 12:14 PM, narendra laga wrote:Hi,Please suggest me to reslove this issue.we are trying to integrate 389 ldap to cyberoam, while doing test connection we are facing below issue.If you are trying to access the "directory manager" IE the root account, it has no suffix: "cn=Directory Manager" Maybe that helps? cyberoam -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander |
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx