On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 09:47 -0700, ghiureai wrote: > >> =20 > > Yes, this is a valid and supported configuration for migration of > the > > data. We don't advise it "long term" but a few days should work just > > Thank you William for reply, one more replication cfg question , > right > now I have : DS server 1 multimaster replication with DS server 2 , > when cfgt the DS server3 ( the one with # OS,# 389-DS > version) ,when > initializing for multimaster replication should I use DS server 1 or > 2? > > Isabella Hi, I don't think it matters too much which you use - but I think it's good to have a migration plan sorted before you start. I have some tips on this in the following blog post: https://fy.blackhats.net.au/blog/html/2016/06/03/zero_outage_migration_of_directory_server_infrastructure.html?highlight=zero It sounds like you have a multimaster pair at the moment, so is your plan to create a new multimaster pair after this migration? -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
