On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 16:30 -0800, Kreuzenstein, Luke (DOA) wrote: > My organization has made extensive use of the Directory Server (Web) > Gateway (DSGW) for 20 years. I've yet to come across any suitable > alternative (suggestions welcome if you're familiar with its functionality). > > We are at least a decade behind with updates, having been tied to the > Oracle fork of directory and mail server products until recently. I am > now experimenting with potential conversion to 389-DS or RHDS including > the updated DSGW, and I may have encountered a bug. > > Is the DSGW still used and supported? I don't think the code is well supported today. It's in a legacy maintenance mode as far as I know. Can I ask how you are using DSGW so that we can work out if there is a better way you could interact with 389-ds? What are you trying to achieve with this process? Thanks, hope to help you with this more, -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
