On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 01:23 +0000, ayeja153@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello everyone, this is my first post. I am looking for an alternative to migrate from Active Directory. I would like to know if it is possible the "human" integration between samba4 and 389-DS. > I think we need to know a bit more about your use case. 389-ds is not a "drop in" replacement for MS AD. Nor is 389-ds easily able to be a component of samba4. Samba4 can act identically to an MS ADDC. It will be the same as you currently have, and you can even move all the FSMO roles over, then decommission your current ADDCs. This would give you a pure open source solution. If you wanted to *migrate* from ADDC to 389-ds, you could probably do so over time with a winsync agreement, then cut over applications to 389-ds. Following sometime, you would cancel the winsync agreement, and be on 389-ds only. However, I do not know what you mean by "human integration". I think you need to expand on your current system, what you want to achieve, and what your goals are. This way we can give you better advice on the correct solution. -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Brisbane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 389-users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
