On 06/06/2016 05:02 PM, Job Cacka wrote:
On 06/03/2016 07:12 PM, Job Cacka wrote:
Just to confirm, you are saying the search below will not return
the entry?
ldapsearch -Hldaps://ds1.domain.com -D "cn=directory manager" -w
"pass" -xLLL -b "dc=domain,dc=com" gidnumber=514
Correct, a blank or empty response. This is now fixed for the same command for gidnumber=514 and 550 because of my testing on Friday.
Do you have a gidNumber index?
Can you please post this output:
grep -i gidnumber /etc/dirsrv/slapd-INSTANCE/dse.ldif
dn: cn=gidnumber,cn=default indexes,cn=config,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=c
cn: gidnumber
dn: cn=gidnumber,cn=index,cn=NetscapeRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=confi
cn: gidnumber
dn: cn=gidnumber,cn=index,cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config
cn: gidnumber
Okay, so I think the gidNumber index just needs to be regenerated:
db2index.pl -n userroot _D "cn=directory manager" -w PASSWORD -t gidNumber
ls -l /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-INSTANCE/db/userRoot
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Oct 13 2015 aci.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 24576 Jun 3 14:43 ancestorid.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 73728 Jun 3 14:43 cn.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 49 Jun 2 04:05 DBVERSION
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 65536 Jun 3 14:43 entryrdn.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Jun 3 16:00 gidnumber.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Jun 3 14:43 givenName.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 409600 Jun 3 16:00 id2entry.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Oct 13 2015 mail.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Oct 13 2015 member.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 32768 Jun 3 14:43 nsuniqueid.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Oct 13 2015 numsubordinates.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 65536 Jun 3 14:43 objectclass.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Jun 3 14:43 parentid.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Jun 3 14:43 sambasid.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Feb 18 07:21 sambasidlist.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 65536 Jun 3 14:43 sn.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Jun 3 14:43 uid.db4
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 16384 Oct 13 2015 uniquemember.db4
Question. Should this be owned by nobody?
Yes, this is how the server is probably configured.
Regards,
Mark
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
389-users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx