Re: 389-ds-base-1.3.5.4 doesn't build on Mageia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, May 30, 2016 01:01:26 PM William Brown wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 10:55 -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> > 389-ds-base-1.3.5.4 doesn't build on Mageia
> > Altlinux reported the same problem with 389-ds-base-1.3.5.3
> > 
> > This is the error:
> > /libslapd_la-ssl.o
> > ldap/servers/slapd/ssl.c: In function 'svrcore_setup':
> > ldap/servers/slapd/ssl.c:1291:5: error: unknown type name
> > 'SVRCOREStdSystemdPinObj' SVRCOREStdSystemdPinObj *StdPinObj;
> >      ^
> > ldap/servers/slapd/ssl.c:1292:18: error: 'SVRCOREStdSystemdPinObj'
> > undeclared (first use in this function) StdPinObj =
> > (SVRCOREStdSystemdPinObj *)SVRCORE_GetRegisteredPinObj();
> > 
> > See log
> > http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/2016052
> > 8191035.spuhler.duvel.44896/log/389-ds-base-1
> > .3.5.4-1.mga6/build.0.20160528191128.log
> > 
> > The attached patch makes it build
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry but we won't be applying that patch as it reverses the behaviour of
> the WITH_SYSTEMD flag (IE, on systems without systemd, it would try and
> build with it ...)
> 
> Your distro needs to update SVRCore. The 389-ds project now owns svrcore,
> and has updated it from 4.0.4 to 4.1.2.
> 
> https://pagure.io/svrcore
> 
> Svrcore 4.1.2 is required to support WITH_SYSTEMD on 389-ds 1.3.5. 4.1.2 of
> course provides the needed SVRCORE_CreateStdSystemdPinObj types.
> 
> The design doc around this feature can be found here:
> 
> https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/systemd-ask-pass.html
> 
> 
> Alternately, this could be changed with a header / function check  (IE
> WITH_SVRCORE_CreateStdSystemdPinObj).
> 
> We don't think it's worth it though, as the fix that svrcore 4.1.2 brings to
> using ssl without a pin.txt on systemd is very, very valueable to
> administrators.
> 
> If you need help with upgrade svrcore on your distro, please feel free to
> ask,

Thanks a lot for your reply, especially on Memorial Day. I see now that the 
requirement was added to the Fedora 389-ds-base spec.


-- 
Best regards
Thomas Spuhler

All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature
ID 60114E63

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--
389-users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux