On 05/16/2016 01:01 PM, Alberto Viana
wrote:
I'm trying to setup a new scenario with 389 and AD
2012 R2 (So far I'm using with AD 2008 R2 and everything works
fine).
Did you use the same version of 389-ds-base against AD on 2008 R2
and 2012 R2?
389-Directory/ 1.3.4.8 B2016.063.1654
Please share the output frpm this command line "rpm -q 389-ds-base"?
Both 2008 R2 and 2012 R2 are supported.
:
After configure the AD replication and Initiate a full
sync, it starts to do some entries and I got the following
error:
[16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
windows_process_total_add: Cannot replay add operation.
Does this error message follow some other detailed error messages?
Such as ...
YOUR_AGREEMENT_NAMEFailed to send %s operation: LDAP
error (ERROR_CODE) ERROR_MESSAGE
or
YOUR_AGREEMENT: Received error [%s] when attempting to
%s entry [%s]: Please correct the attribute specified in the error
message. Refer to the Windows Active Directory docs for more
information.
If not, could you enable the replication log level and share the
error log with us?
And after that:
[16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
Replica has no update vector. It has never been initialized.
[16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
Replica has no update vector. It has never been initialized.
[16/May/2016:16:36:51 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
Replica has no update vector. It has never been initialized.
I found a really old ticket that seems to be related to
same error:
This is a regression only affected 389-ds-base-1.3.1.x. So, 1.3.4.x
does not need the patch.
but with win2008r2 and fixed.
2012 R2 is supported, is that true?
Could you also share your Windows Sync agreement? Do you happen to
have 2 Directory Servers -- one for 2008R2 and another for 2012R2,
could you provide both?
--
389-users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
--
389-users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx