Re: Upgrading to Centos 7...

[Paul Whitney <paul.whitney@xxxxxxx>]

I think as a general rule of thumb:

RHEL 5 = RHDS 8

RHEL 6 = RHDS 9

RHEL 7 = RHDS 10

Paul M. Whitney
E-mail: paul.whitney@xxxxxxx
Sent from my browser.

On Nov 17, 2015, at 02:23 PM, Derek Belcher <jderekbelcher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi guys!

What version of 389ds is the equivalent to the RHDS packages? Currently I am on Centos 6 and planning on upgrading all of my severs to Centos 7 to get the newer 389ds packages, here is a list of my current packages:

# cat /etc/issue

CentOS release 6.2 (Final)

# rpm -qa 389*

389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch

389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch

389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64

389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.el6.x86_64

389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch

389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch

389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch

389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64

389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch

389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.el6.x86_64

389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64

I would like to know the current supported packages or stable versions for Centos 7 that are equal to the RHDS versions, I just dont want to be on the bleeding edge. Does that make sense?

Also is there an upgrade path that I need to be following, any caveats that I need to be cognizant of?

thank you!

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@%(host_name)s
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx