I dumped the users to LDIF file but didn’t find anything special between the affected and unaffected users The only clue I found in the replication log is it doesn’t recognize the affected users as local (also says uid is -1) and then it deletes them. From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Noriko Hosoi
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 7:35 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users On 10/19/2015 09:23 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: i'll do some comparison tomorrow between affected and unaffected user, hopefully I will find something
Thanks a lot!!
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 19/10/2015 19:04 (GMT+02:00)
To: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users
Thank you for the update.
Regarding this symptom:
> they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550).
I'm curious what's the difference between the deleted 200 users and the rest.
Thanks,
--noriko
On 10/19/2015 12:35 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi Noriko, This is the version I have installed:
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-60.el6.x86_64 on CentOS 6.5 I was able to work around the problem by backing up the group and people OU to LDIF files , do the sync (which deleted the affected accounts)and after that importing them back, this caused the LDAP server to sync them to AD. BTW I noticed the initial sync is deleting the same accounts. Thanks, On 10/18/2015 02:06 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi, I have setup a sync agreement between directory server and active directory 2012R2 and I’m getting a very strange behavior, if I am doing 2 way sync (the default) the sync completes successfully but not all the users are created in AD, not only that , they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550). I’m syncing to Blank OU in AD My DS version is 1.2.2-1
Is it the version of 389-ds-base (not 389-ds)?
rpm -q 389-ds-base Thanks, ![cid:image001.gif@01CE0DED.C3CB64A0]() ![XtremIO]()
| Yair Mizrahi Sr Lab IT engineer Office: + 972 722563243 Mobile: + 972 54 2327687 Email: Yair.Mizrahi@xxxxxxx | | EMC² - XtremIO
Glil Yam 46905, Herzliya, Israel
www.emc.com |
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users |
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
