Re: winsyncsubtreepair

[Mark Boyce <Mark.Boyce@xxxxxxxx>]

Rich,

 

I am able to get the core dump and it appears to be a segmentation fault when modifying the replication agreement… anything specific from the dump that would be helpful?

 

Thanks,

 

m.

 

Mark L. Boyce

Senior Identity Management Analyst

University of California, Office of the President

 

From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:59 AM
To: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair

 

On 07/07/2015 11:49 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:

Rich,

 

The version of 389-ds-base is 1.3.3.10-1.fc22.x89-64 and it’s the same behavior running the agreement against AD 2003 or AD 2012.

By “two pairs” in mean to indicate that I have two winsyncsubtree pair attributes; i.e  ou=people,dc=example,dc=org:cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org and ou=people,dc=example,dc=org:ou=administrators,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org

I can either modify the sync agreement using ldapmodify or from the GUI with “Initialize Full Re-synchronization” and as soon as I hit enter after adding another winsyncsubtreepair value the server can’t be contacted and must be restarted.

That sounds like a crash - http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#debugging-crashes

By “in-scope”, I mean to say that I cannot use a single windows subtree in the agreement; i.e. cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org.

 

Does that add clarity?

 

Mark L. Boyce

Senior Identity Management Analyst

University of California, Office of the President

 

From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:22 AM
To: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair

 

On 07/07/2015 10:07 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:

Good Morning,

 

Has anyone else seen this behavior;  after configuring Winsync I add one or perhaps two “pairs” to the sync agreement (ds:AD)

Firstly - what version of 389-ds-base?  rpm -q 389-ds-base
What version of Windows/AD?  2012 R2?

I don't know what you mean by 'two "pairs"'.

and run a full sync successfully.  Upon subsequent attempt to add another pair the dirsrv abends (nothing in the logs)

What commands are you running?  How do you know the dirsrv abends?  That is, if there is nothing in the logs, what commands are you running to see the failure?

and the modify operation fails (either via CLI or GUI).  This is critical to our org as the AD structure doesn’t lend it’s self to a single “in-scope” OU…

Also not sure what you mean by "single in-scope OU".

 

Thanks,

 

m.

 

 

Mark L. Boyce

Senior Identity Management Analyst

University of California, Office of the President

415 20^th Street

Oakland, CA 94612

Office: 510.987.9681

Cell: 209.851.0196

 

 

--

389 users mailing list

389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

 

--

389 users mailing list

389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

 

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users