> > Are you running RHDS8? It is quite old... I'd recommend the latest > version which is RHDS 10. We are running 9.2 in production at my work place, and I run latest stable from git personally. > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en > -US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Configuration_Command_and_File_R > eference/index.html > Yep, this lists the differences nicely. I believe the 9.2 docs still had this issue, so I'll be sure to read the 10 docs. > > Because it's under the retro_changelog_plugin section, and the > > discussions of retro changelog is described as: > > > > "T he Retro Changelog plug-in configures Directory Server to > > maintain a > > changelog that is compatible with > > the changelog implemented in Directory Server 4.0, 4.1, and 4.1x. > > Maintaining a retro changelog is > > essential to maintain a changelog for directory clients that depend > > on > > a Directory Server 4.x-style > > changelog." > > > > In the administration guide. > Retro changelog is a separate plug-in. Despite of the name "retro", > it > is still useful to store the change logs in the database independent > from new/old replications. > > dn: cn=Retro Changelog Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config > objectClass: top > objectClass: nsSlapdPlugin > objectClass: extensibleObject > cn: Retro Changelog Plugin > nsslapd-pluginPath: libretrocl-plugin > nsslapd-pluginInitfunc: retrocl_plugin_init > nsslapd-pluginType: object > nsslapd-pluginbetxn: on > nsslapd-pluginEnabled: off > nsslapd-pluginprecedence: 25 > nsslapd-plugin-depends-on-type: database > nsslapd-plugin-depends-on-named: Class of Service > cn=changelog5,cn=config is the changelog being used in MMR -- > cn=Multimaster Replication Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config. > Makes sense. Thanks for your time again. -- William <william@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users