|
On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya
wrote:
Hello,
On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
I'm in the
same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on
RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon.
Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option.
But the only "official" 389 release for RHEL6 is years
old.
I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739,
that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15
is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one
fix that we need that isn't available to us. But
really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have
come out since then. The longer we're held back, the
harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all
the new features once we do upgrade.
The fix for the
ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and
newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6.
Sorry about missing
the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your
RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6?
Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t
in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere?
Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to
know what’s changed.
As a RHEL customer, you have access to the portal, so you can go to
https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/rhel---6/x86_64/168/389-ds-base/1.2.11.15-50.el6_6/x86_64/fd431d51/package
and look at the changelog for the 389-ds-base package. This has
descriptions of the changes along with bugzilla bug number and
sometimes 389 trac ticket numbers.
There's probably some way to get a list of all errata for the
389-ds-base package in RHEL6, but I can't seem to find it.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
|
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
