Re: Question about accountunlocktime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm sorry I haven't gotten back sooner.  I turned on the audit log and have been monitoring it.  I never see accountunlocktime get set, but I know that I've had people not be able to log in, and in those cases, they've always had some value in accountunlocktime.  What I do to "unlock" them is to delete that attribute as well as the passwordRetryCount.  Again, I was under the impression that once the user gets locked because of too many failed attempts, it will unlock itself based on the passwordLockoutDuration.  In my case, this isn't working, but I don't really know how else I can prove it.

Thanks,
Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of German Parente
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 9:28 AM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re:  Question about accountunlocktime



----- Original Message -----
> From: "harry devine" <harry.devine@xxxxxxx>
> To: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 February, 2015 2:35:37 PM
> Subject: Re:  Question about accountunlocktime
> 
> Not a problem.  I looked at my settings, and the only thing that is 
> different on those settings you gave was passwordChange is set to on 
> for me, where yours is off.  I also didn't have the audit log enabled, 
> so I just enabled it and I'm going to monitor it for a while and see 
> what happens.  But what I can't figure out is why your setup works and mine doesn't.
> 

hi Harry,

passwordChange is not related to account lock but to the ability to change passwords by user itself.

However, I have also tested with "passwordChange: on" and it's also working for me.

Could you please send the exact message you see to realize account is still locked ?

Thanks and regards,

German.

> Thanks,
> Harry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of German 
> Parente
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:36 AM
> To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> Subject: Re:  Question about accountunlocktime
> 
> Hi Harry,
> 
> sorry for long delay. The feature it working quite well for me.
> 
> For instance, user0 binding three times with wrong password is locked:
> 
> [root@rh6 ~]# ldapsearch -p 1389 -h localhost -D 
> "cn=user0,ou=people,o=redhat" -w wrong  -b "o=redhat" cn=user0
> ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49)
> [root@rh6 ~]# ldapsearch -p 1389 -h localhost -D 
> "cn=user0,ou=people,o=redhat" -w wrong  -b "o=redhat" cn=user0
> ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49)
> [root@rh6 ~]# ldapsearch -p 1389 -h localhost -D 
> "cn=user0,ou=people,o=redhat" -w wrong  -b "o=redhat" cn=user0
> ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49)
> [root@rh6 ~]# ldapsearch -p 1389 -h localhost -D 
> "cn=user0,ou=people,o=redhat" -w wrong  -b "o=redhat" cn=user0
> ldap_bind: Constraint violation (19)
> 	additional info: Exceed password retry limit. Please try later.
> 
> I can see in audit logs after the third wrong bind:
> 
> time: 20150217151208
> dn: cn=user0,ou=people,o=redhat
> changetype: modify
> replace: passwordRetryCount
> passwordRetryCount: 3
> -
> replace: accountUnlockTime
> accountUnlockTime: 20150217141508Z
> 
> 
> If I try to bind with right credentials:
> 
> ldapsearch -p 1389 -h localhost -D "cn=user0,ou=people,o=redhat" -w 
> user0  -b "o=redhat" cn=user0
> ldap_bind: Constraint violation (19)
> 	additional info: Exceed password retry limit. Please try later.
> 
> 
> NOTE: in my case, passwordLockoutDuration: 180
> 
> So, more than three minutes later:
> 
>  ldapsearch -xLLL -p 1389 -h localhost -D 
> "cn=user0,ou=people,o=redhat" -w
>  user0  -b "o=redhat" cn=user0
> [root@rh6 ~]#
> 
> user0 arrives to bind ok.
> 
> We can see in audit logs that the password retry count has been 
> reset'd (we check accounts locked only if the retry count is greater 
> than the max failures allowed).
> 
> time: 20150217151719
> dn: cn=user0,ou=people,o=redhat
> changetype: modify
> replace: passwordRetryCount
> passwordRetryCount: 0
> -
> 
> My settings:
> 
> nsslapd-pwpolicy-local: on
> passwordChange: off
> passwordLockout: on
> passwordUnlock: on
> passwordLockoutDuration: 180
> passwordResetFailureCount: 660
> 
> and
> 
> passwordmaxfailure: 3
> 
> 
> Thanks and regards,
> 
> German.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "harry devine" <harry.devine@xxxxxxx>
> > To: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Friday, 13 February, 2015 7:27:10 PM
> > Subject: Re:  Question about accountunlocktime
> > 
> > passwordunlock is set to On, and passwordunlockduration is set to 1800.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Harry
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> > German Parente
> > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:51 AM
> > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> > Subject: Re:  Question about accountunlocktime
> > 
> > Hi Harry,
> > 
> > could you check the value of attribute type "passwordUnlock" under 
> > cn=config ?
> > 
> > thanks and regards,
> > 
> > German.
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "harry devine" <harry.devine@xxxxxxx>
> > > To: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 1:31:04 PM
> > > Subject: Re:  Question about accountunlocktime
> > > 
> > > OK, I get that.  What I don't get is why it won't automatically 
> > > UNLOCK after lockout duration.  The accountunlocktime stays set 
> > > forever, and as long as that's set, the user can't log in and one 
> > > of the admins has to clear the accountunlock time attribute manually.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Harry
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> > > William
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:54 PM
> > > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> > > Subject: Re:  Question about accountunlocktime
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 01:49 +0000, harry.devine@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > Any insight on this????
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The value is utc. My current time is 13:16 UTC+10:30. When I lock 
> > > the account I get:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > accountUnlockTime: 20150213031647Z
> > > 
> > > Split up is
> > > 
> > > 2015-02-13 0316.47 UTC
> > > 
> > > Which is 1316 - 1030 = 0246
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Add to this that my passwordLockoutDuration is 1800 aka 30 minutes:
> > > 
> > > 0246 + 0030 = 0316.
> > > 
> > > Thus:
> > > 
> > > 2015-02-13 0316.47 UTC
> > > 
> > > This is why you may see the accountUnlockTime in the past.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 389 users mailing list
> > > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > > --
> > > 389 users mailing list
> > > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> > --
> > 389 users mailing list
> > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux