Oh – no notes in that search, but there are
notes in the preceding and subsequent searches.
It looks like it returns the first 100 results
then searches for groupOfNames for each of those
users, and then repeats until all 30,000 users
is done:
08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
fd=64 slot=64 SSL connection from <ip addr
1> to <ip addr 2>
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
SSL 256-bit AES
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
op=0 BIND dn="<service account>"
method=128 version=3
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0
dn="<service account>"
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0
filter="(objectClass=*)"
attrs="supportedControl"
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
op=2 SRCH base="ou=EMPLOYEES,dc=<our
dc>" scope=2
filter="(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson))"
attrs="businessCategory carLicense cn
departmentNumber description
destinationIndicator displayName
distinguishedName employeeNumber employeeType
facsimileTelephoneNumber givenName groups
homePhone homePostalAddress initials
internationalISDNNumber l mail manager mobile
o objectClass o ou pager
physicalDeliveryOfficeName postOfficeBox
postalAddress postalCode
preferredDeliveryMethod preferredLanguage
registeredAddress roomNumber secretary seeAlso
sn st street telephoneNumber
teletexTerminalIdentifier telexNumber title
ubcEduCwlPUID uid nsAccountLock
passwordRetryCount"
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
op=2 SORT cn (*)
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130261
op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=100 etime=0
notes=P,A
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130262
fd=83 slot=83 SSL connection from <ip
addr 1> to <ip addr 2>
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130262
SSL 256-bit AES
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130262
op=0 BIND dn="<service account>"
method=128 version=3
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130262
op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0
dn="<service account>"
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130262
op=1 SRCH base="ou=GROUPS,dc=<our dc>"
scope=2
filter="(&(objectClass=groupOfNames)(member=uid=<login_x>,ou=EMPLOYEES,dc=<our
dc>))" attrs="1.1"
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800] conn=130262
op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=5 etime=0
… <snip>
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:05 -0800] conn=130262
op=100 SRCH base="ou=GROUPS,dc=<our dc>"
scope=2
filter="(&(objectClass=groupOfNames)(member=uid=<login_x+100>,ou=EMPLOYEES,dc=<our
dc>))" attrs="1.1"
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:05 -0800] conn=130262
op=100 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=3 etime=0
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:05 -0800] conn=130261
op=3 SRCH base="ou=EMPLOYEES,dc=<our
dc>" scope=2
filter="(&(objectClass=inetOrgPerson))"
attrs="businessCategory carLicense cn
departmentNumber description
destinationIndicator displayName
distinguishedName employeeNumber employeeType
facsimileTelephoneNumber givenName groups
homePhone homePostalAddress initials
internationalISDNNumber l mail manager mobile
o objectClass o ou pager
physicalDeliveryOfficeName postOfficeBox
postalAddress postalCode
preferredDeliveryMethod preferredLanguage
registeredAddress roomNumber secretary seeAlso
sn st street telephoneNumber
teletexTerminalIdentifier telexNumber title
ubcEduCwlPUID uid nsAccountLock
passwordRetryCount"
… <snip>
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:05 -0800] conn=130261
op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=100 etime=0
notes=U,P
Oh cool – I didn’t know about logconv.pl!
Output follows.
Thanks again,
Trev
Total Log Lines Analysed: 799338
----------- Access Log Output ------------
Start of Logs: 08/Dec/2014:05:56:33
End of Logs: 08/Dec/2014:10:31:46
Processed Log Time: 4 Hours, 35 Minutes,
13 Seconds
Restarts: 0
Total Connections: 87873
- StartTLS Connections: 0
- LDAPS Connections: 87265
- LDAPI Connections: 0
Peak Concurrent Connections: 34
Total Operations: 227313
Total Results: 227314
Overall Performance: 100.0%
Searches: 109051
(6.60/sec) (396.24/min)
Modifications: 28121
(1.70/sec) (102.18/min)
Adds: 69
(0.00/sec) (0.25/min)
Deletes: 0
(0.00/sec) (0.00/min)
Mod RDNs: 0
(0.00/sec) (0.00/min)
Compares: 0
(0.00/sec) (0.00/min)
Binds: 85702
(5.19/sec) (311.40/min)
Proxied Auth Operations: 0
Persistent Searches: 0
Internal Operations: 0
Entry Operations: 0
Extended Operations: 4370
Abandoned Requests: 0
Smart Referrals Received: 0
VLV Operations: 0
VLV Unindexed Searches: 0
VLV Unindexed Components: 0
SORT Operations: 3
Entire Search Base Queries: 0
Paged Searches: 505
Unindexed Searches: 2
Unindexed Components: 502
Unindexed Search #1 (notes=A)
- Date/Time:
08/Dec/2014:10:30:12
- Connection Number: 215422
- Operation Number: 2
- Etime: 1
- Nentries: 100
- IP Address: 10.7.8.105
- Search Base:
ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
- Search Scope: 2 (subtree)
- Search Filter:
(&(objectclass=inetorgperson))
Unindexed Search #2 (notes=A)
- Date/Time:
08/Dec/2014:07:08:04
- Connection Number: 130261
- Operation Number: 2
- Etime: 0
- Nentries: 100
- IP Address: 10.7.8.105
- Search Base:
ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
- Search Scope: 2 (subtree)
- Search Filter:
(&(objectclass=inetorgperson))
Unindexed Component #1 (notes=U)
- Date/Time:
08/Dec/2014:05:56:45
- Connection Number: 129083
- Operation Number: 117
- Etime: 0
- Nentries: 100
- IP Address: Unknown_Host
- Search Base:
ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
- Search Scope: 2 (subtree)
- Search Filter:
(&(objectclass=inetorgperson))
Unindexed Component #2 (notes=U)
- Date/Time:
08/Dec/2014:05:57:10
- Connection Number: 129083
- Operation Number: 122
- Etime: 0
- Nentries: 100
- IP Address: Unknown_Host
- Search Base:
ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
- Search Scope: 2 (subtree)
- Search Filter:
(&(objectclass=inetorgperson))
…<snip>
Unindexed Component #502 (notes=U)
- Date/Time:
08/Dec/2014:10:30:47
- Connection Number: 215422
- Operation Number: 3
- Etime: 0
- Nentries: 100
- IP Address: 10.7.8.105
- Search Base:
ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
- Search Scope: 2 (subtree)
- Search Filter:
(&(objectclass=inetorgperson))
FDs Taken: 87873
FDs Returned: 87863
Highest FD Taken: 275
Broken Pipes: 0
Connections Reset By Peer: 0
Resource Unavailable: 0
Max BER Size Exceeded: 0
Binds: 85702
Unbinds: 83924
- LDAP v2 Binds: 0
- LDAP v3 Binds: 85702
- AUTOBINDs: 0
- SSL Client Binds: 0
- Failed SSL Client Binds: 0
- SASL Binds: 0
- Directory Manager Binds: 0
- Anonymous Binds: 0
- Other Binds: 85702
----- Connection Latency Details -----
(in seconds) <=1 2
3 4-5 6-10 11-15 >15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(# of connections) 87553 169 27
18 5 2 89
----- Current Open Connection IDs -----
Conn Number: 201302 (10.7.127.250)
Conn Number: 217063 (10.7.8.105)
Conn Number: 217064 (10.7.8.105)
Conn Number: 217061 (10.7.8.105)
Conn Number: 132242 (10.7.0.52)
Conn Number: 196007 (10.7.127.250)
Conn Number: 196107 (10.7.127.250)
Conn Number: 215425 (10.7.8.105)
Conn Number: 217060 (10.7.8.105)
Conn Number: 215422 (10.7.8.105)
Conn Number: 207139 (10.7.127.250)
Conn Number: 217062 (10.7.8.105)
----- Errors -----
err=0 224008 Successful
Operations
err=32 1652 No Such
Object
err=53 1652 Unwilling To
Perform
err=49 1 Invalid
Credentials (Bad Password)
err=65 1 Objectclass
Violation
----- Top 20 Failed Logins ------
1
uid=ehannah,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
From the IP address(s) :
1 10.7.127.250
----- Total Connection Codes -----
U1 83924 Cleanly Closed Connections
B1 1749 Bad Ber Tag Encountered
----- Top 20 Clients -----
Number of Clients: 13
[1] Client: 10.7.8.105
83638 - Connections
83631 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
[2] Client: 137.82.5.97
1652 - Connections
1652 - B1 (Bad Ber Tag Encountered)
[3] Client: 142.103.218.107
1095 - Connections
[4] Client: 142.103.218.106
1094 - Connections
[5] Client: 10.7.127.250
112 - Connections
106 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
1 - B1 (Bad Ber Tag Encountered)
[6] Client: 127.0.0.1
57 - Connections
55 - B1 (Bad Ber Tag Encountered)
2 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
[7] Client: 142.103.149.136
55 - Connections
41 - B1 (Bad Ber Tag Encountered)
14 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
[8] Client: 10.7.0.52
51 - Connections
50 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
[9] Client: 142.103.106.141
29 - Connections
29 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
[10] Client: 142.103.106.143
28 - Connections
28 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
[11] Client: 142.103.106.145
23 - Connections
23 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
[12] Client: 142.103.106.135
23 - Connections
23 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
[13] Client: 142.103.106.142
16 - Connections
16 - U1 (Cleanly Closed
Connections)
----- Top 20 Bind DN's -----
Number of Unique Bind DN's: 18
83795 uid=eldap-svciiq,ou=service
accounts,ou=eldap,ou=services,dc=id,dc=ubc,dc=ca
1652 cn=bill
fisher,ou=people,dc=dartware,dc=com
112 cn=directory manager
55
uid=eldap-svcvpnsync,ou=service
accounts,ou=eldap,ou=services,dc=id,dc=ubc,dc=ca
51 cn=replication
manager,cn=config
6
uid=alexnam,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
4
uid=priyanth,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
4
uid=arsuther,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
4
uid=huynhh,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
3
uid=ehannah,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=andyfehr,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=bullfrog,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=eddiefok,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=elyoung,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=elainez,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=flokam,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=mailvaga,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=sjones,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
----- Top 20 Search Bases -----
Number of Unique Search Bases: 27876
78174 ou=groups,dc=<our dc>
1652
ou=people,dc=dartware,dc=com
676 ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>
312 ou=people,dc=<our dc>
220 cn=mapping tree,cn=config
124 root dse
13
cn=idm-status-activeemployees,ou=idm,ou=role,ou=groups,dc=<our
dc>
3
uid=jbartnik,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=rodsprus,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=zanottic,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=ttucker,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=dbilczuk,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=phys2012,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=ydeng,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=natcrang,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=lillaroy,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
2
uid=wpr8847,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
1
uid=ap8040,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
1
uid=asr5,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
1
uid=belzberg,ou=employees,dc=<our dc>
----- Top 20 Search Filters -----
Number of Unique Search Filters: 30968
28016 (objectclass=*)
1652 (cn=bill fisher)
504
(&(objectclass=inetorgperson))
55 (cn=eldap3*)
55 (cn=eldap5*)
55 (cn=eldap4*)
55 (cn=eldap2*)
6
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=alexnam,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
5
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=ehannah,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
5
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=priyanth,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
5
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=arsuther,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
4
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=ydeng,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
4
(&(objectclass=inetorgperson)(ubceducwlloginkey=<login
key 1>))
4
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=elyoung,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
4
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=zanottic,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
4 (&(uid=devlin11))
4
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=huynhh,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
4
(&(objectclass=inetorgperson)(ubceducwlloginkey=<login
key 2>))
4
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=lillaroy,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
4
(&(objectclass=groupofnames)(member=uid=rodsprus,ou=employees,dc=<our
dc>))
----- Top 20 Most Frequent etimes -----
219090 etime=0
8202 etime=1
20 etime=2
1 etime=147
1 etime=135
----- Top 20 Longest etimes -----
etime=147 1
etime=135 1
etime=2 20
etime=1 8202
etime=0 219090
----- Top 20 Largest nentries -----
nentries=100 502
nentries=34 1
nentries=27 1
nentries=26 1
nentries=7 3
nentries=6 9
nentries=5 85
nentries=4 334
nentries=3 1957
nentries=2 6701
nentries=1 85038
nentries=0 14420
----- Top 20 Most returned nentries -----
85038 nentries=1
14420 nentries=0
6701 nentries=2
1957 nentries=3
502 nentries=100
334 nentries=4
85 nentries=5
9 nentries=6
3 nentries=7
1 nentries=26
1 nentries=27
1 nentries=34
----- Extended Operations -----
2185 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.12
DS90 Start Replication Request
2185 2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.5 End
Replication Request (incremental update)
----- Top 20 Most Requested Attributes
-----
78174 1.1
56799 o
28712 description
28712 cn
28712 nsAccountLock
28711 givenName
28711 ubcEduCwlPUID
28711 uid
28711 displayName
28711 employeeNumber
28711 mail
28711 objectClass
28711 sn
28400 ou
28400 passwordRetryCount
28400 distinguishedName
28399 businessCategory
28399 employeeType
28399 facsimileTelephoneNumber
28399 groups
----- Recommendations -----
1. You have unindexed searches, this can
be caused from a search on an unindexed
attribute, or your returned results exceeded
the allidsthreshold. Unindexed searches are
not recommended. To refuse unindexed searches,
switch 'nsslapd-require-index' to 'on' under
your database entry (e.g. cn=UserRoot,cn=ldbm
database,cn=plugins,cn=config).
2. You have unindexed components, this
can be caused from a search on an unindexed
attribute, or your returned results exceeded
the allidsthreshold. Unindexed components are
not recommended. To refuse unindexed searches,
switch 'nsslapd-require-index' to 'on' under
your database entry (e.g. cn=UserRoot,cn=ldbm
database,cn=plugins,cn=config).
Cleaning up temp files...
Done.
On 12/08/2014
05:43 PM, Fong, Trevor wrote:
Hi Mike,
It's Mark :-) I get that a lot for some
reason.
Thanks for the reply. The typical
result of the result is:
[08/Dec/2014:07:08:04 -0800]
conn=130262 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101
nentries=5 etime=0
Yeah this looks fine.
There are no notes=A/notes=U in the
results.
Do you mean in the entire access log, or
just for that search?
Can you run logconv.pl and post the
results? "logconv.pl -V <access
logs>"
Thanks Trevor,
Mark
Objectclass and member are both
indexed.
There were 30,000-odd searches on
conn=130262, which took 34 mins.
Thanks,
Trev
On
12/08/2014 02:08 PM, Fong, Trevor
wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We’ve inherited a 389-ds
system (1.2.11.15-48.el6_6) that
is running on a VM provisioned
with a single CPU. We have been
experiencing high CPU with a
client that connects with a
single connection, and then runs
large amounts of queries of the
form:
SRCH
base="ou=GROUPS,dc=<our
dc>" scope=2
filter="(&(objectClass=groupOfNames)(member=uid=<loginname>,ou=EMPLOYEES,<our
dc>))" attrs=“1.1"
Trevor,
From the access log, what is the
result of this search? etime? It
there a notes=U/notes=A in the
result? It could be an unindexed
search which would cause the high
CPU.
Thanks,
Mark
We’re wondering if adding
extra CPU’s to the vm will make
things better. The original
engineer noted that at the time
of implementation, he had come
across some notes that indicated
that the underlying process was
single threaded and adding extra
CPU’s would not make any
improvement; in fact, on heavily
loaded vm infrastructure like
ours, may make things worse as
the the vm would have to wait
for the CPU to become available.
Is this still true?
Thanks a lot,
Trev
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users