On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I'm not sure what you mean by "what's available in the repo" vs. "what's available by source”.ya know, i am not really sure either. but you’re response reinforces in my mind that something weird is going on here and i have to have a chat with my sysadmins as to why i am not seeing what i should be seeing in the EPEL repos - we have firewall stuff means I am not in full control of how i get stuff. OR, i just go with source for 29 when it comes out and wait for the OS dist to catch up. That might be the path of least resistance, but i think i still need to resolve my EPEL issues with my sysadmins. I never answered this question - I just heard back from my sysadmins and they have determined there was a problem with our outbound proxy config which prevented us from seeing the fedora people updates - so now i don’t need to build from source any more as i can see 1.2.11.29 - as i said, it was a local problem. and, FYI - i have already deployed .29 to our test environment and it appears to have corrected all of our existing problems except for what is documented by 47730 - but i can live with turning off SSL in console until nss is fixed. again, thank you so much to all the 389 devs. i continue to recommend 389 as the directory server to use above all others because of its lineage, its performance and its support and community. /mrg |
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
