Re: Some bind DNs sporadically can't search users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/03/2014 12:05 PM, Morgan Jones wrote:
On Mar 3, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 03/03/2014 08:56 AM, Morgan Jones wrote:

We're pulling our hair out over this issue and wondering if it rings a bell for anyone or perhaps there's a bug fix in a  later version of 389 that might resolve it.  I've looked and not found anything but it's also not the easiest issue to search for.  We are on CentOS DS now but can move to 389 of course but hesitate to put forth the effort if we aren't reasonably sure it will resolve our issue.
...
We are considering many options, primarily just moving to 389 on CentOS 6.  That's a fairly big task for a site of our size so we'd like some confidence that we won't see a repeat of this issue.  There's talk of considering other products which no one wants to do but we're all edgy as this has caused a fair amount of downtime and about all I can do at the moment is monitor for it and re-initialize when it happens which doesn't inspire confidence.
I've never seen this problem, so I can't be sure that upgrading will solve it.  However, it is almost impossible for us to support centos-ds 8.2, so we are unlikely to be able to debug 8.2 and provide a patch for 8.2.
This is understandable.  Now that I have a better idea of how the community works I would not implement on CentOS-DS again.

CentOS is downstream of RHEL. RHEL is downstream of 389. Even if a 389 developer is able to reproduce on CentOS, we have to first get the patch into upstream 389, then into RHEL, then there has to be a RHEL release, then someone in CentOS has to pick up that build and respin for CentOS.


If you can reproduce the problem with 389-ds-base 1.2.11.x, it will be much easier for us to debug and fix.
We are still unable to repeat it reliably but are working to do so in our dev environment.  I'll be in touch when/if we are able to do so in 389 1.2.11.x.

thanks,

-morgan

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux