That is a very good question. No cannot provide any of those items. I was just hoping maybe there would be some "known undocumented trick" to kickstart this server. Perhaps the next time Kent L. comes out here he can take a look and see if there is anything that stands out.
Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whitney@xxxxxxx
On Jan 30, 2014, at 01:32 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/30/2014 11:33 AM, Paul Whitney wrote:Guys I appreciate you help in this issue. I unfortunately am hosting on a disconnected network and cannot post any of the information you are requesting without in essence "re-typing" it all in. In the interest of saving time, I am just reinitializing the directory server. In the past this has worked.For the record, this db2index function does work fine on the RHDS 8.2. But on both RHDS 9.0 and 9.1, it appears to get stuck. Even after killing the process, the server attmepts to resume the process but makes no progress.
If we cannot get large logs or debug traces, how do you suggest going about solving this problem?
Can you give us your databases and index configuration?
I know for a fact that db2index works on RHDS 9.1, with very large databases. So the problem them becomes - what is it about your data and/or configuration that is causing problems?
Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whitney@xxxxxxxOn 01/30/2014 10:17 AM, David Boreham wrote:On 1/30/2014 10:18 AM, Paul Whitney wrote:rpm -q 389-ds-base389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-30.el6_5.x86_64No errors, just a status:reindex userRoot: Processed 315000 entries (pass 11) -- avg rate15283456.5/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec. hit ration 0%Then errors log states threshold has dropped belo 50%, ending pass11, sweeps files for merging later, then restarts with pass 12.First thing to determine is : is it "stuck" for some reason, oractually performing work ?Could you note and post here the machine load in the sulking period --CPU, I/O stats, e.g the output from "iostat -x 1" ?Also, if you could grab some process thread stack captures (use"pstack" , or gdb) from the indexing process and post the highlightshere, that might give some insight into what's going on.
Yes, using the Debugging_Hangs instructions:
http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Debugging_Hangs
The output from "strace -p xxx" run on the indexing process could alsobe useful, but probably less useful than the information mentioned above.--389 users mailing list389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users