On 12/09/2013 10:55 AM, Paul Whitney
wrote:
On Dec 09, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Rich Megginson
<rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/09/2013 09:30 AM,
Paul Whitney wrote:
Rich,
I deinstalled and reinstalled my DS 9.0 ISO, then
ran through the updates:
- DS9-RHBA-2011-1788 (nothing to update/install
from here since the ISO is as current in versions)
- DS9-RHBA-2012-1345 (updated the 389-ds-console
to 1.2.7-1)
- DS9-RHBA-2013-0960 (updated everything to 9.1)
So now this is what I have installed:
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-22
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-22
389-ds-console-1.2.7-1
389-console-1.1.7-1
389-admin-1.1.34-1
389-adminutil-1.1.17-1
389-admin-console-1.1.8-1
redhat-ds-admin-9.1.0-1
redhat-ds-console-9.1.0-1
redhat-idm-console-9.1.0-1
redhat-ds-9.1.0-1
redhat-ds-base-9.1.0-1
redhat-admin-console-9.1.0-1
Did you run setup-ds-admin.pl -u on all of the systems
that you upgraded?
I ran it and am getting the following error: Error adding
entry 'cn=PAM Pass Through Auth,cn=plugins,cn=config'.
Error: Already exists (i tried to remedy this by removing
the entry, but still getting the same error).
If setup-ds-admin.pl -u is failing, then the console will fail to
find the correct jar files.
"i tried to remedy this by removing the entry" - how did you do
this?
idm-console-framework-1.1.7-2
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.65.1.11.1.3
As root (just to eliminate any write permissions
issue), I launched the 389-console.
That shouldn't make any difference.
Log in successfully to master on local host.
However a couple of things:
- The console window cannot access any of the
slapd instances or the admin portion because system
"failed to install a local copy of
redhat-admin-9.0.jar or one of its supporting
files." (The 9.0 jar links were replaced with 9.1).
Links in this directory are confusing as all get
out. Not sure why so many are needed....
setup-ds-admin.pl -u is supposed to change the versions
of the required jar files from 9.0 to 9.1.
Links in which directory are confusing? You should
never have to look in the directory.
I agree I should not have to look in the html/java
directory. But that is where the jar files come from and
wanted to verify that 9.0 jar files were replaced.
You should see 9.1 jar files in that directory (no matter if
setup-ds-admin.pl -u worked - the 9.1 jar files are in the rpms).
In the admin-serv error log I am getting error:
File does not exist:
/usr/share/dirsrv/html/redhat-admin-9.0.jar (the
java directory was not overlooked in the path, this
is the error in the log, as if it is looking for the
9.0 jar files in html).
Let's see what the console is looking for. Run
redhat-idm-console -D 9 -f console.log
Unfortunately, I cannot capture this information and post
here. Info is on intranet with no access to Internet.
I don't it matters if setup-ds-admin.pl -u is failing.
scrub the console.log and email it to me (it will
probably be too large to post to the list)
On Dec 06, 2013, at 04:59 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 12/06/2013
02:34 PM, Paul Whitney wrote:
Rich,
I think the problem has to do with the
version of JAR files the console I am
running is looking for. I see in
/usr/share/dirsrv/html/java a lot of
symbolic links that cascade back to 389
jar files.
The console downloads these from the admin
server and stores them in
~/.redhat-idm-console/jars. It is the
latter directory used by the console.
They are all 9.1 and my console is
looking for 9.0.
A 9.1 server installation should use the 9.1
jars.
What do you mean by "my console is looking
for 9.0"?
While I am ok with creating symbolic
links and for 9.0 jar files, why will
the console not use the jars already
present?
A 9.1 server must use the 9.1 jars, not the
9.0 jars.
|
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users