On 11/04/2013 07:52 PM, Ezequiel
Larrarte wrote:
No matter that they are different versions?
Yes. IMO, it would be very bad programming practice to change the
replication protocol to be incompatible in every major version. It
would make upgrades and interoperability a nightmare.
On Nov 4, 2013 12:21 PM, "Rich Megginson"
< rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 11/04/2013 08:16 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
Hi Rich, Can you be more specific?
On Nov 4, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rich
Megginson" < rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On
11/03/2013 05:15 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
Hi people ...
Nowadays, I have CentOS5 on my servers, but next
year I ll start
setting up CentOS 6 on them.
I ll first install 389DS on the main CentOS5 servers
from EPEL
repository (currently version 1.2.1) and I guess
replication between
them ll work fine because I m using the same version
of 389DS.
The thing is that EPEL for CentOS 6 has 389DS
version 1.2.2 instead of 1.2.1.
So, what would a safe way to migrate to a newer
version of 389DS?
- Do I have to migrate all CentOS 5 servers
participating in the
replication process at the same time to CentOS 6?
No.
All versions of 389/RHDS/CentOS DS can replicate with each
other.
-
How do you handle that kind of situations? Is there
any
documentation I can read?
Thanks!
|
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users