Re: COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OK, thanks!

It would be awesome if that kind of information would be in the 389DS
homepage, FAQ section.
Or a HOWTO that explains migration process to a newer version of 389DS
in a working replication environment.

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Rob Crittenden <rcritten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>
>> On 11/04/2013 09:39 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/04/2013 09:06 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No matter that they are different versions???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes.  The replication protocol is the same.
>>>> The only problems you might have are schema and syntax incompatibility.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I thought that EPEL would package the same version of 389DS for both
>>>>> systems CentOS 5 and 6 for compatibility reasons,
>>>>
>>>> No, why?
>>>
>>> If I were responsible for 389DS package, I would package the same
>>> version for CentOS 5 and 6. That way, migration from one operating
>>> system to another would be easy.
>
>
> Do you not want any new features? RHEL 5 was released in 2007.
>
>
>>
>> I am one of the people responsible for 389DS package.  We make sure
>> migration is possible if not easy from one operating system to another.
>
>
> Right. The way we recommend it in FreeIPA is to set up a new master on the
> new OS, get replication done, then shut down the old side. Bingo, you're on
> the new version with the same data. In practice it might be a little more
> bumpy than that, particularly if you want to run them in parallel for a
> while, but we've been consumers of 389-ds for 6+ years and haven't had many
> issues in differing versions.
>
>>>
>>> I don 't understand why they package different versions. If 389DS
>>> people decide to make a big change, suppose in the replication
>>> protocol. How would you migrate from CentOS 5 to 6?
>>
>>
>> We make sure migration is possible.  We try to make it easy.  The
>> replication protocol has not changed in several years.
>>
>>>
>>>>> but that 's not what
>>>>> they have in their repositories.
>>>>>
>>>>> The thing is ...
>>>>>
>>>>> If I have 3 server with CentOS 5 and 389DS 1.2.1 replicating and
>>>>> working ... then I migrate one of those servers to CentOS 6 and 389DS
>>>>> version 1.2.2 (or the version EPEL decides to package). Will they work
>>>>> fine together?
>>>>
>>>> They should, yes.
>>>>
>>>>> Does EPEL consider that kind of things?
>>>>
>>>> It has absolutely nothing to do with EPEL.
>>>
>>> Who package 389DS for EPEL?
>>> EPEL people or 389DS people?
>>>
>>>>> I think they are very important ... suppose that version 1.2.2 does
>>>>> not work fine with 1.2.1. What would you do in such scenario?
>>>>
>>>> I would file a ticket and get it fixed asap, because it is supposed
>>>> to work.
>>>
>>> No, I tried both and they work fine together, but I cant 't find
>>> documentation to know if it 's safe ...
>>>
>>>>> Thanks ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/04/2013 08:16 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rich, Can you be more specific?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 4, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/03/2013 05:15 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi people ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nowadays, I have CentOS5 on my servers, but next year I ll start
>>>>>>>> setting up CentOS 6 on them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I ll first install 389DS on the main CentOS5 servers from EPEL
>>>>>>>> repository (currently version 1.2.1) and I guess replication between
>>>>>>>> them ll work fine because I m using the same version of 389DS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The thing is that EPEL for CentOS 6 has 389DS version 1.2.2
>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>> 1.2.1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, what would a safe way to migrate to a newer version of 389DS?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Do I have to migrate all CentOS 5 servers participating in the
>>>>>>>> replication process at the same time to CentOS 6?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All versions of 389/RHDS/CentOS DS can replicate with each other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - How do you handle that kind of situations? Is there any
>>>>>>>> documentation I can read?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
Ezequiel Larrarte.
" ... God Always Takes The Simplest Way! ... "
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux