On 10/15/2013 07:39 AM, Parasit Hendersson wrote:
W dniu 2013-10-15 15:24, Rich Megginson pisze:
A given solution in this case it does not help, i made (again)
initialization and the effect is exactly the same. What else can be
wrong?
You initialized the server "slave port 389" from the server "master
port 389" and you still get "Replica has a different generation ID"?
Yes, in 389 console, in "Configuration" tab, "Replication" in menu
tree, right click on replication agrement -> "Initialize Consumer"
(all data will be erased, etc) finally OK. Last status - "Total update
suceeded"
I also try from console by ldapmodify, but now i dont remember all
used comands.
Ok. Please show excerpts from the supplier and consumer errors logs
showing this happening.
Usually all changes from master are properly replicated, with some
unexplained exceptions and i don't know why.
If you are getting "Replica has a different generation ID" then
nothing should be replicating from "master port 389" to "slave port
389".
I know, its strange, but lots entries are replicated :/
Do you have more than one master? Is the slave getting updates from
another master?
With Regards
Parasit Hendersson
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
