On 07/30/2013 10:43 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
Sorry, I think I'm following now. Instead of syncing the dnanextvalue
between servers, each server should have a range that doesn't overlap
with the other.
Yes, that's definitely the easiest way to do it. You can sync ranges
between replicas, but that's quite complicated and best to avoid if
possible.
On 2013-07-30 12:36, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/30/2013 10:19 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
Each server does have the same range, yes,
Why?
however the first server was configured about a month before the
second was even stood up. Here is the ldif that I used on the new
server; the same ldif was used on the original server:
dn: cn=UID numbers,cn=Distributed Numeric Assignment
Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config
objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject
cn: UID numbers
dnatype: uidNumber
dnamagicregen: 99999
dnafilter: (objectclass=posixAccount)
dnascope: dc=infra,dc=dfw
dnanextvalue: 10000
dn: cn=GID numbers,cn=Distributed Numeric Assignment
Plugin,cn=plugins,cn=config
objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject
cn: GID numbers
dnatype: gidNumber
dnamagicregen: 88888
dnafilter: (|(objectclass=posixAccount)(objectclass=posixGroup))
dnascope: dc=infra,dc=dfw
dnanextvalue: 10000
The difference is that the dnanextvalue on the original server is
now up to around ~10080.
Kyle
On 2013-07-30 11:00, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/30/2013 08:48 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
If it has the patch, what would be causing my dnanextvalue fields
to not be in sync? They're using the local value of the
dnanextvalue, and when adding a new user, the UID and GID are at
the beginning of the local value instead of matching the value on
the other server.
How did you configure DNA? Note that configuration under cn=config
does not replicate to other servers. Does each server have the same
range?
On 2013-07-30 10:42, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/30/2013 08:41 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
Sorry, I should know better. 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-12.el6_4.x86_64
Then yes, it has that patch.
On 2013-07-30 10:38, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/30/2013 08:09 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote:
I have found this bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514955), with a
patch that appears to have been applied back in 2009.
Would that patch have made it into 389?
What version of 389-ds-base are you using?
Kyle
On 2013-07-29 15:20, Kyle Johnson wrote:
Hey everyone,
The DNA plugin has been setup on my first server for a while
now and
has been working fine.
I've added a second server to the environment and configured
it as
multi-master. After setting up the plugin on that server and
then
adding a test user to it, the UID is starting at the bottom
of the
dnanextvalue. I would like for dnanextvalue to stay in sync
between
each server in a multi-master environment.
How do you do this? Am I missing something obvious?
Kyle
-- 389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
