On 2/21/2013 11:11 AM, Patrick Raspante wrote:
I was mostly curious if the difference in cache configurations has any
negative effect on the integrity of the replication agreement between
the directory instances.
To illustrate, say one directory instance is managing several root
suffixes and has increased cache settings. The other instance has
default settings. The default instance is perfectly capable of
operating on the replicated data-set and/or doesn't have the
performance requirements of the other instance.
No, totally unrelated.
It would be wise to be careful that your replicas can keep up with the
changes propagated to them over the long term (otherwise a long queue of
changes waiting to be re-played on the replica can build up).
You'd be more interested in I/O performance for that though, and this
would only be a concern in a very large, very high traffic deployment
and in that case you'd have many other things to worry about besides
cache size...
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
