---------------------------------------- > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:53:34 -0700 > From: rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx > To: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > CC: picturebook16@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: notes=U, unindex search? really > > On 01/18/2013 08:29 AM, Picture Book wrote: > > filter="(&(AllowAccess=Y)(uid=bill))" > > AllowAccess is unindexed attribute > > uid is indexed attribute > > > > access log search result: notes=U > > > > I imagine that directory server will do an indexed search by uid=bill, get the entry and then verify if AllowAccess=Y. To me this kind of search is indexed search. > > > > example: > > > > [18/Jan/2013:10:17:24 -0500] conn=124757 op=1 SRCH base="ou=people,dc=?" scope=1 filter="(&(AllowAccess=Y)(uid=bill))" attrs=ALL > > [18/Jan/2013:10:17:24 -0500] conn=124757 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 notes=U > > > > etime=0 confirms that this search is fast. > > You might imagine that, but that's not how the server works. It parses > the filter, sees that AllowAccess is unindexed, and uses an unindexed > search. I tried filter="(&(uid=bill)(AllowAccess=Y))". no more "notes=U". It would be great if the server can optimize search filter like I imagine. Because some ldap clients do not allow custom search filter. Thank you. > > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
