Alberto,
Regards!
--
I had a 389ds server with more than 70 windows sync agreements (for a first user reconciliation). Each of them to different AD domain controllers and different domains. No problems at all. But I wouldnt try it if the AD domain was the same regardless of the number of controllers that held it (your case).
Regards!
De: "Alberto Viana" <albertocrj@xxxxxxxxx>
Para: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Enviados: Jueves, 17 de Mayo 2012 23:26:04
Asunto: Sync with active directory doubts
Hello,
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Para: 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Enviados: Jueves, 17 de Mayo 2012 23:26:04
Asunto: Sync with active directory doubts
Hello,
I have 2 389 DS servers a 6 AD servers and i read this on red hat documetation about windows replication:
"There can only be a single sync agreement between the Directory Server environment and the Active Directory environment. Multiple sync agreements to the same Active Directory domain can create entry conflicts."
Now I´m trying the following scenario:
server2 389(consumer) <- replication -> server1 389 <- replication -> Server1 AD
Server2 AD
Server3 AD
So in my master 389 server (server1) I have 3 agreements with 3 different AD servers. It´s not clear if "Active Directory environment" means just one AD server.
Just to make clear that the 6 AD servers are in the same Active Directory domain and all replicate information with each other. I have this number of AD servers because they are located in different places(physically).
Can this scenario create entry conflitc? Am I suppose to sync with just one AD server?
Thanks,
Alberto Viana
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
