On 05/04/2012 06:47 AM, Diego Woitasen wrote:
I didn't know how to title this mail. I think this should be a feature request in Track when I want to discuss this here first. I have 389DS with 150 DBs with an structure similar to this: dc=company,dc=com ou=Headquarters,dc=company,dc=com ou=Branch1,dc=company,dc=com ou=Branch2,dc=company,dc=com . . . ou=Branch150,dc=company,dc=com Each one of this subtrees are in separate DBs because I have subtree replication between the 150 branches of the companies. 80% of the objects are in the ou=HeadQuarters. I've noticed that the performance is definetely better when I use base ou=Headquarters in my applications. I have indexes on each DB but I think that the problem is that 389DS doesn't have a master index or something to improve the searchs in scenarios like mine.
Can you explain more about what you mean by "master index"?
May be the solution is to implemen another replication code that doesn't required separate DBs for subtree replication. Shall I file a ticket? Or there is a solution now? Regards, Diego
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
