On 05/01/2012 09:42 AM, Michael R. Gettes wrote:
I'm wondering if this is a bug in the logging of CMP operations. What we have empirically determined is the right thing is happening but the log is not indicating a CMP of a member attribute against a specific DN which is NOT any of the DNs in the log snippet below. The dn="" is the area of concern on the CMP operation. If you're interested, we are using the pam ldap client on RHEL6 to generate this behavior. DS is 1.2.9.9 on RHEL5 Many thanks! /mrg [01/May/2012:10:55:52 -0400] conn=143810 op=0 BIND dn="uid=compserv-unix-nss,ou=Specials,dc=cmu,dc=edu" method=128 version=3 [01/May/2012:10:55:52 -0400] conn=143810 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="uid=compserv-unix-nss,ou=specials,dc=cmu,dc=edu" [01/May/2012:10:55:52 -0400] conn=143810 op=1 SRCH base="dc=cmu,dc=edu" scope=2 filter="(uid=gettes)" attrs="host authorizedService shadowExpire shadowFlag shadowInactive shadowLastChange shadowMax shadowMin shadowWarning uidNumber" [01/May/2012:10:55:52 -0400] conn=143810 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [01/May/2012:10:55:52 -0400] conn=143810 op=2 CMP dn="" attr="member" [01/May/2012:10:55:52 -0400] conn=143810 op=2 RESULT err=5 tag=111 nentries=0 etime=0 [01/May/2012:10:55:52 -0400] conn=143810 op=3 UNBIND
Is this https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/163 ?
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
