On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:20 -0400, solarflow99 wrote: > Since i've been using it, its been flawless. Its a scalable > implementation, 389-console was great for providing a refined way to > setup replication, SSL certs, etc. You might want to use a better > front end to administer users, groups, etc. I'd recommend it for > production. If you need commercial support, there's Redhat directory > Server. hope this helps.. > <snip> Any input on 389 versus RedHat DS for production? We need to upgrade our DS soon and are wondering if 389 would be the better way to go but we are hesitant as we always think of Fedora projects as experimental and RedHat as stable. In this case, the rapid advancement might be a distinct advantage. Thanks - John -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
