On 04/21/2011 02:26 AM, Steven Jones wrote: > Hi, > > Are these bog std 389 in rhel 6 though? the reason I ask is there is also the free-ipa packages which seems to use parts of 389.....so Im wondering if there is any compile/build differences for the 389 stuff in RHEL6 to suit free ipa....which may mean the official rhel packages are best avoided if doing FDS. The 389-ds-base 1.2.8.x in RHEL 6.1 is almost identical to 1.2.8.x in Fedora/epel5 except * the one in RHEL only has critical bug fixes from now on - the one in Fedora/epel5 may have additional non-critical bug fixes (but no new functionality in the 1.2.8 branch) * the one in RHEL does not have replication/winsync in the core package - it is available in an additional package ds-replication > regards > > Steven > ________________________________________ > From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Rich Megginson [rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2011 4:36 a.m. > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > Subject: Re: [389-users] 389 ds packages for EL6? > > On 04/19/2011 10:21 AM, Rupert Kolb wrote: >> Hi, >> >> are there rpm packages to install 386 Directory Server at EL6? >> (I found packages for EL5 only) > 389-ds-base is in the RHEL 6.1 beta >> Thanks >> Rupert Kolb >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
