On 03/03/2011 03:42 PM, Alaric wrote: > Hi folks > > At $WORKk we are having a discusion about the scalability of > different directory server products, and I thought I'd reach out and > see anyone had any information that I could feed back into > our dialogue. There are three main points that i'm curious about, > first the statement was made that Red Hat doesn't suggest RHDS 8.* for > use in enterprise environments This is not true. Where did this information come from? > and instead suggests an LDAP server that uses or comes with Jboss > (OpenDS or OpenLDAP maybe? I was a bit unclear on this point... ). Also not true. Where did this information come from? > Second, 389/RHDS is in fact just Sun Directory Server 5.0. No, it is several generations ahead of Sun DS 5.0. See http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/History > And finally that RHDS/389 isn't compatible with the following products: > > Weblogic 10g+ > > WebSphere 6+ > > OAM 10g/11g > > OVD 11g > > OIF 11gR3 > > OAAM 11g > > OIM 11gR2 > > Sun IdM v6.1, 7.2, 8.1.1 > Not sure about this. We don't certify with these, but if they work with standard LDAPv3 servers, they should work with RHDS/389. > > > I'd really like to be able to provide some constructive feedback to > my collages, since the feels like a matter of misunderstanding and > an opportunity to educate each other. > > > Thanks in advance for any feedback! > > > -a > > > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110303/085a2ce9/attachment.html
