Hi Carten, Thanks for your answer. In my case there's not a testing plugin but the one that governs the win synchronization. As I am a sort of deep newbie can you tell me where should I made those modifications in an out-of-the box configuration, so I can retry your guidelines? Regards! El mar, 08-02-2011 a las 12:17 +0100, Carsten Grzemba escribi?: > No, it is not a normaly behaviour. > > I had a similar problem because my winsync plugin was not registered after a restart. I have fixed the problem that I have changed the plugin dependencies. But I do not know if it is the right way. > > see thread "[389-devel] Problem using winsync API" in December 2010: > > ... > I have removed from win sync plugin: > > nsslapd-plugin-depends-on-named: Multimaster Replication Plugin > > from the plugin configuration, and instead added on the Multimaster Plugin config > > nsslapd-plugin-depends-on-named: test Winsync API > ... > > Regards > Carsten > > ----- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht ----- > Von: Juan Carlos Camargo Carrillo <juancar at eprinsa.es> > Datum: Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011, 11:49 > Betreff: 1.2.8 Windows sync agreement initialization > An: 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Hi, > > > > I'm running 389-ds version 1.2.8 on CentOS 5x and configured a windows sync agreement against a 2003 active directory server. Everything works as expected. However, everytime I restart the directory server (service dirsrv restart) I need to reinitialize the windows agreement. Messages such as "Replica has no update vector. It has never been initialized" continously filling the error log until I proceed with the init. But the replica was initialized and conversations between 389 and AD were working nicely. And what I would not want at all is to lose any changes made on either side as a result of the initialization process. My question then, is this the normal behaviour ? > > > > Thanks! > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110208/59fbe9ec/attachment.html