On 01/27/2011 08:33 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote: > >> >> >>> 389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at some point. We cannot >>> put it in EPEL6 because it would conflict. We are interested in >>> suggestions about how to provide binary packages on EL6. >>>> >> pardon my ignorance, but what would it clash with ? > 389-ds-base in RHEL6. > > > > And I assume that's in the Directory Server channel because on my > RHEL6 machine no 389-ds-base package exists and I do not have a > subscription to Redhat Directory service. Again working on my > assumption that means that RH directory service is using the same > package name as 389ds which would create the conflict. So either > 389-ds packages are renamed or cannot go in EPEL, now its making sense. 389-ds-base is not _yet_ in RHEL6. Will be there in 6.1 or 6.2. > > So is there some obstacle for the 389ds project to host its own yum repo? Other than being a PITA? But if that is the only way . . . > > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20110127/e756398c/attachment.html
