>_______________________________________ >From: 389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org [389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Rich Megginson [rmeggins at redhat.com] >Sent: 24 August 2010 02:31 >To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. >Subject: Re: Automatic master/consumer initialization > >Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: >> Hi >> Is there any difference between right clicking on a replication agreement just created and selecting the Initialize Consumer or letting "nature" go its course and >>letting replication happen in the next "cycle". >> >> Up until now I have created replication agreements using the GUI, but I have now started doing it via ldif files. If I don't immediately run: >> dn: cn=%repl-agreement-name%,cn=replica,cn=dc\3dCompany,cn=mapping tree,cn=config >> changetype: modify >> replace: nsds5beginreplicarefresh >> nsds5beginreplicarefresh: start >> >> It seems to start on its own anyway. Having checked the data nothing looks wrong so I thought I would just double check. >> >Doing nsds5beginreplicarefresh: start does a replica init. A consumer >must be initialized before a supplier can begin updating it. If you >have already initialized a consumer from another supplier/master, you >don't need to initialize it again. Thanks, I just realized that I was seeing the same data on all servers because of the way that I accessed the console remotely, which is why I thought that it had automatically initialized itself. Regards ________________________________________________________________________ In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. ________________________________________________________________________
