Johan Venter wrote: > On 7/08/2010 3:19 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> Johan Venter wrote: >> > <snip most of my original text> > >>> Looking at the documentation at >>> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Windows_Sync.html#Windows_Sync-About_Windows_Sync >>> there are no caveats mentioned regarding multi-master replication and AD >>> password sync, in fact their provided architecture diagram (lower part >>> of the page) seems to indicate it should work in this situation. >>> >>> >> I guess we should make it clear, because it does not work. See >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182507 >> > > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for the reply. Noting that the bug you linked to was reported > early 2006, and then was modified in 2009 (and apparently pushed to 8.2 > of RHDS), is there any reason to expect that this particular issue will > be solved any time soon in 389? > Nothing was done for this issue for RHDS 8.2. We may address this issue in a later release. > 389 is a fantastic product, and while we can work around the issue by > only pointing the apps that can change LDAP passwords to the server with > the sync agreement to AD, this kind of defeats the purpose of > multi-master replication for this particular setup - sync to AD is > touted as an important feature of 389 (at least, it's one of the > features that I'm sure I'm not alone in wanting and that in large part > swayed the choice to use 389), and this particular caveat is not > mentioned in any of the documentation that I've seen. > > Many regards, > Johan > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >
