Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for helping. I followed your direction and exported another > LDIF for my 2nd database but whenever I try to load it I get an error > message "ldap_add: Operations error". What's in the errors log? > > Here's a little information on my DIT hierarchy. > Database 1: dc=foo,dc=com > Database 2: dc=new_foo,dc=foo,dc=com > > I ran the ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> using the verbose switch and > here's the output. > ldapmodify: started Wed Jun 23 17:11:34 2010 > > ldap_init( <hostname>, 389 ) > add objectclass: > top > extensibleObject > add cn: > import_2010_6_23_17_11_34 > add nsInstance: > userRoot > add nsFilename: > /home/chud/OLAY/LDAP_REPOPULATION_TEST/second_dit.ldif > add nsImportChunkSize: > 0 > add nsUniqueIdGenerator: > time > adding new entry cn=import_2010_6_23_17_11_34, cn=import, cn=tasks, > cn=config > ldap_add: Operations error > > At this point, I am stuck. Do you have any idea what went wrong? The > reload of the root database does work but when I reload the 2nd > database that sits underneath in the root database in the DIT it > doesn't work. > > Thanks in advance! > > - David > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote: > > Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > > Thanks Rich, > > > > I did more experiment, and I noticed one of my database didn't get > > reload after I ran ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> > <http://ldif2db.pl> script > > > > My DIT has a root database and then a sub database under the root > > database. When I did the export, I exported from the root database. > > When I ran the ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> > <http://ldif2db.pl> script, only the root > > database get reloaded but not the sub database. > > > > Do you have any ideas? > Yes. You need an LDIF for each database. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > - David > > > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Rich Megginson > <rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>> wrote: > > > > Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > > > Hi Rich, > > > > > > I did some testing and it appears to be working as you > expected. > > > The steps involve > > > 1) Export the directory database to a LDIF > > > 2) Reload the directory database > > > 3) Reinitialize the consumer > > > > > > I have another question. I noticed there's an ACI on the > directory > > > database LDIF. > > > aci: (targetattr = "*")(version 3.0; acl "SIE Group"; > allow (all) > > > groupdn = "l > > > dap:///cn=slapd-foo, cn=Red Hat Directory Server, cn=Server > > Group, cn= > > > foo.com <http://foo.com> <http://foo.com> > <http://foo.com>, ou=tscei.dd-x.com <http://tscei.dd-x.com> > > <http://tscei.dd-x.com> <http://tscei.dd-x.com>, > > > o=NetscapeRoot";) > > > > > > Do I need to modify the hostname in that ACI if I want to > load the > > > same directory database into another LDAP? Essentially I want > > to use > > > a basic directory database LDIF and load it to a bunch of > different > > > development LDAP we have. Some LDAPs are multi-mastered > configured > > > and most are not. > > No, you do not need to change that hostname. > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > - David > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Rich Megginson > > <rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>> wrote: > > > > > > Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > > > > Another question about directory re-population. > > > > > > > > If I want to create a generic LDIF backup for a > bunch of test > > > > directory servers, in the exported LDIF file, should I > > remove the > > > > following attributes? or it doesn't really matter? > > > > nsUniqueId: 795dca00-5fa011df-8de2866b-a65dc74a > > > > creatorsName: > > > > modifiersName: cn=directory manager > > > > createTimestamp: 20100514213428Z > > > > modifyTimestamp: 20100514213430Z > > > I don't think it matters. I suppose you might want to > keep > > > createTimestamp and modifyTimestamp just for your own > > information. > > > > > > > > My LDIF backup will be imported back to the LDAP using > > > ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> <http://ldif2db.pl> > <http://ldif2db.pl> > > > > <http://ldif2db.pl>. > > > > > > > > - David > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Chun Tat David Chu > > > > <beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Rich, I'll give that a try. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Rich Megginson > > > > <rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>> > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > > > > > Hi Rich, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for replying. > > > > > > > > > > Just making sure I'm using the right > utility. To > > > > reinitialize the > > > > > directory, I use the ldif2db.pl > <http://ldif2db.pl> > > <http://ldif2db.pl> <http://ldif2db.pl> > > > <http://ldif2db.pl> > > > > <http://ldif2db.pl> Perl script right? > > > > Yes, if you need to restore _all_ servers > from an LDIF > > > backup. > > > > The > > > > reason I say _all_ is that when you do a restore > > from a > > > "raw" > > > > LDIF file, > > > > this wipes out all of the replication state > > information and > > > > changelog > > > > information. This means you will have to > use this > > server to > > > > re-init > > > > other masters and consumers - (I mean > re-init in the > > > sense of > > > > Initializing Consumers - > > > > > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Managing_Replication-Initializing_Consumers.html) > > > > > > > > You can use db2ldif.pl <http://db2ldif.pl> > <http://db2ldif.pl> > > <http://db2ldif.pl> > > > <http://db2ldif.pl> -r to create an > > > > LDIF file suitable for offline > > > > replica init > > > > > > > > > > - David > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Rich > Megginson > > > > <rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>> > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>> > > > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>> > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> > > > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com > <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>>>>>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Chun Tat David Chu wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am hitting an issue with > reinitializing the > > > > directory database. > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically I have two directory > servers and > > they're > > > > configured using > > > > > > multi-master replication scheme. > > > > > > > > > > > > When I reinitialize the directory > > database, the > > > > directory became > > > > > > inaccessible. I think it is related > with my > > > multi-master > > > > > replication > > > > > > setup because when I use only > reinitialize > > one LDAP, > > > > it would work > > > > > > just fine > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is if multi-master > replication is > > > enabled > > > > on two LDAPs > > > > > > then do I need to reinitialize both > LDAPs > > at the > > > same > > > > time or > > > > > just one > > > > > > LDAP? > > > > > If you use one master (m1) to re-init the > > other master > > > > (m2), you > > > > > do not > > > > > need to then use m2 to re-init m2. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > - David > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:42 PM, > Chun Tat > > David Chu > > > > > > <beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>> > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>> > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>> > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>>> > > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>> > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>> > > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>> > > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>> > > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com> > > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com > <mailto:beyonddc.storage at gmail.com>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Reinitializing the directory > database > > does the > > > > trick! I'm going > > > > > > to do more testing on it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > > > > > > - David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:43 PM, > David > > Boreham > > > > > > <david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>> > > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>> > > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>>> > > > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>> > > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>> > > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>> > > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org> > > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org > <mailto:david_list at boreham.org>>>>>>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/14/2010 11:40 AM, Chun > Tat David > > > Chu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We use 389 Directory as > part of our > > > > development lab. > > > > > Every > > > > > > time when > > > > > > > we do a new test, we need to > > > repopulate our 389 > > > > > directory to > > > > > > a clean > > > > > > > slate (i.e. delete all > existing > > data and > > > > re-create a base > > > > > > hierarchy > > > > > > > tree). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Our current way of doing so is > > simply > > > using > > > > the ldapdelete > > > > > > command to > > > > > > > remove all existing data > and use > > > ldapadd to > > > > re-create > > > > > the base > > > > > > > hierarchy tree. This approach > > is okay but > > > > sometime it > > > > > could > > > > > > take up > > > > > > > to 20 to 30 minutes to > delete all > > > existing data > > > > > depending on the > > > > > > > amount of data saved in the > > directory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a more efficient > way to > > > repopulate > > > > the 389 > > > > > Directory? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. Import an almost empty > LDIF file. > > > You can > > > > also copy the > > > > > > on-disk > > > > > > database underneath a server > (when > > it is > > > shut > > > > down), if you > > > > > > know what > > > > > > you're doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 389 users mailing list > > > > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>> > > > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>> > > > > > > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>> > > > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 389 users mailing list > > > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>> > > > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>> > > > > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 389 users mailing list > > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>> > > > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>> > > > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 389 users mailing list > > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>> > > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 389 users mailing list > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>>> > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 389 users mailing list > > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > -- > > > 389 users mailing list > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>>> > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > > 389 users mailing list > > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > -- > > 389 users mailing list > > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
