is anybody having problems with latest selinux policy update in F12?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



me wrote:
> ok, I see there is a bug in bugzilla submitted (569990)
> it's has just been badly timed, if base policy now has 389 taken off 
> or stripped
> and selinux 389 subpackages are still in testing repo and if
> selinux-policy-3.6.32-92 fixes the problem it is still in testing repo
Yes, bad timing/miscommunication
> first I'm going to give a bash to base policy
> as attachment custom module (if anybody wants to use it please examine
> it first, this is supposed to be only quick/temperamental fix)
ok, thanks
>
> On 03/03/2010 03:44 PM, me wrote:
>> hi Rich
>> do you know why it all broke so suddenly with latest update for base 
>> policy?
>> for some users it could be kind of a disaster, if now base policy is
>> lacking rules for 389
>> then some other dependencies, like ones you said of, should be pulled in
>> automatically
>> for me it looked like that, everything just crashed, like if there was
>> no major part
>> of 389's things in base selinux policy.
>> I've just yumed 389-ds and no extra deps were looked for with regards to
>> selinux
>> tracking seliunx events and rendering custom module for inevitable
>> I guess lots of people on F12 were having lots of problems today
>> cheers
>>
>> On 03/03/2010 03:07 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>   
>>> me wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> 389-ds-base 1.2.6.a2 has a selinux sub-package - 389-ds-base-selinux -
>>> and 389-admin-1.1.11.a2 also - 389-admin-selinux - these are currently
>>> in the testing repos - yum install/upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
>>> 389-ds-base-selinux 389-admin-selinux
>>> Not sure if these packages have hit all of the mirrors yet, but if they
>>> have, try them out (and give us some feedback!)
>>>
>>>     
>>>> -- 
>>>> 389 users mailing list
>>>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> -- 
>>> 389 users mailing list
>>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>>
>>>      
>> -- 
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>    
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux