Hi again What's the difference between the referrals specified in the suffixes and the referrals specified in a replica? We have had ever the referrals specified in the suffix. Do you mean to set them too in the replica? Regards. (Testing 389DS 1.2.3, having problems with schema syntaxes...) 2009/10/19 Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>: > Juan Asensio S?nchez wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> We are having problems with replication. We have four master servers >> replicating one database (database 1), and two other servers in other >> building that are masters of other database (database 2). Replication >> between the databases of the others are in hub mode (server1 of >> building1 with server1 of building1, and server2 of building1 with >> server2 of building2; server3 and server4 of building1 only have >> agreements with server1 and server2 of building1). Yesterday we had to >> remove the replica of server4 of database 1. Next, we did ree-enable >> the replica and the replication agreements, but the replica was >> enabled with a different id than before. Now, we have this error on >> all servers, although replication is working fine: >> >> [16/Oct/2009:12:44:39 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin - >> repl_set_mtn_referrals: could not set referrals for replica >> dc=domain,dc=local: 1 >> > > I don't think this is a critical error. ?You can manually set the referrals > to use - in the console for the Replica config, at the bottom of that window > (under the Supplier DN area) you can specify the referrals to use. ?However, > you will have to manage these manually - they are not set automatically like > the regular replication referrals are. > >> (dc=domain,dc=local is the prefix that owns the database 1). I don't >> know if this error is critical, but i don't like to see errors in the >> log (call me fool if you want). I have read some posts: >> >> - http://blogs.sun.com/marcos/entry/on_cleanruv >> - http://blogs.sun.com/piotr/entry/how_to_clean_ruv_s >> >> All about Sun, but i am not sure if this will work, or if it is >> dangerous because it says that the solution is unsupported and >> irreversible. How can I get rid of this message? is it critical? >> > > You could try using that. ?I would suggest backing up all of your data and > config first. >> >> Regards and thanks in advance. >> >> -- >> 389 users mailing list >> 389-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > >
