Thanks Rich...Would it be possible for you to share some configuration details to achieve this for OpenLDAP version 2.3? Cheers, A --- On Mon, 10/12/09, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 10:47 AM Ankur Agarwal wrote: > Can i use chaining between master-slave without having different "ou"? > I mean if i have exactly same directory structure and same set of OUs > can i still have chaining between master and slave? > Yes. > > Cheers, > Ankur > > > --- On *Thu, 10/8/09, Michael Str?der /<michael at stroeder.com>/* wrote: > > >? ???From: Michael Str?der <michael at stroeder.com> >? ???Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write >? ???To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server >? ???project." <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> >? ???Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 1:38 AM > >? ???Ankur Agarwal wrote: >? ???> >? ???> I have a master-slave set-up with write operations always being >? ???done to >? ???> the master node. Now there is an issue where i need to read some >? ???data >? ???> immediately after write, and my read request goes to the slave. >? ???It fails >? ???> in cases when replication hasnt happened from master to slave before >? ???> this read operation. > >? ???You simply should not do that. Read from the master if you have to >? ???rely on the >? ???consistency of what you recently wrote to the master. > >? ???> Is there a LDAP level configuration to handle this situation? >? ???> Can chaining help in this case? > >? ???No. (Except chaining the read requests of the writing client to >? ???the master >? ???which you don't want I guess). > >? ???Ciao, Michael. > >? ???-- >? ???389 users mailing list >? ???389-users at redhat.com >? ???<http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users at redhat.com> >? ???https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >??? -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- 389 users mailing list 389-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091013/79a59d29/attachment.html