Tim Hartmann wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I've been looking at upgrading the version of libpam-passthru-plugin.so > that we use, we are using v 1.1.3 from an older version of Fedora > Directory Server on our RHDS 8.0 Install, I noticed that v 1.2.2 is > available in 389 on Fedora 11, and thought it might be useful to upgrade > my version of the Plugin. Are there any Pros/Con's to using a newer > version of the plug in? > You want to use the pam passthrough plugin from 389 1.2.2 Fedora 11 with 1.1.3? There are binaries for EL5. > Thanks! > > Tim > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20091125/f01505b7/attachment.bin
