On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: > Chris Phillips wrote: >> >> >> Try editing /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/adm.conf to point to the >> correct server, then try register-ds-admin.pl >> >> >> I'm afraid I'm still in the dark here. The adm.conf is used by the admin >> server to contact the DS instance to be managed? I thought the logic was the >> other way round, with the DS server "phoning home" to register itself to the >> Admin. Either way, the adm.conf then only lists one server in the ldapurl, >> and the other two attributes referencing the server, sie and isie both get >> changed to match the server in the ldapurl as part of the registration, >> removing all other references to the server that was in there. So whilst I >> thought my modifications to adm.conf (changing the ldapurl from server b to >> a) on server b and running register-ds-admin.pl on server b would add server >> b to the admin console on server a. Instead it *replaced* server b with >> server a on the admin console on server b, meaning both admin consoles were >> then registered to administer server a. Not anything like what I wanted! >> >> Any pointers? >> > Change adm.conf back to point to which server you want to use as your main > server, and then run setup-ds-admin.pl -u My main what server? DS or Admin? As I understand that, that will register whatever server is listed as the ldapurl as the only instance in the Admin server on the box I'm running this on. Correct? Am I being deluded about this? I'm expect to log in to an admin server with the idm console, and see a list of 8 different machines listed there, and be able to browse the ldap tree of any of those machines, including their o=NetscapeRoot and be able to manage ACI's, password policies and such... This is the model you recommend, no? Thanks Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20090622/d6cc1d51/attachment.html