Emmanuel BILLOT wrote: > Rich Megginson a ?crit : >> Emmanuel BILLOT wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Does anyones know how can we explain a 90% CPU utilization on FDS ? >>> Many forum on the web speak about index problem or memory variables >>> misconfiguration (|nsslapd-idlistscanlimit and co).| >>> || >>> |Howerver, i do not found any good web ites which explains howto | >>> |- monitor indexes utilization| >>> |- build/rebuilt indexes (if this is the problem)| >>> |- configure properly FDS for having good performance| >>> || >>> |Our directory tree contains 15000 entries.| >>> || >>> |Does anyone know what can we do ? Best pratices ?| >> What version of FDS? What platform? What sort of hardware? >> >> The logconv.pl tool is a good place to start to diagnose indexing >> issues. >>> |How to know if there is a problem on our config ?| >>> || >>> |Regards,| >>> |||| >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -- >> Fedora-directory-users mailing list >> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> > Sorry i've the logconv utility, which says > Unindexed Searches: 0 > > So i dan't explain why the CPU is so high. > > FDS 1.1.3 on Centos 5.1, VMWare > logconv.pl has more output - you might try looking at the operation times, then refer back to the access log to see what operations are taking a long time -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20090121/48c4e0e6/attachment.bin
