Rich Megginson wrote: > Edward "Koko" Konetzko wrote: >> Rich Megginson wrote: >>> Edward "Koko" Konetzko wrote: >>>> I have a set of CoS objects I am importing in and their add times >>>> are extremely slow about 1 a second. >>> What platform? What 389-ds-base version? By import do you mean >>> ldif2db or ldap add? >> RHEL 5 64 bit, RHDS 8.1 and using ldapadd. Hardware is HP DL385 with >> 16 gigs of ram, raid1 for os and raid 10 for /var/lib/dirsrv. I >> have tried with the import buffer(?) set to auto and 2 gigs. > Since you are using Red Hat Directory Server, you should contact Red > Hat support. > > import buffer is only when using ldif2db. LDAP Add is much slower > than ldif2db. I think part of it is that CoS is optimized for > searching, but not so much for adding new CoS definitions - it builds > a cache in memory to make searches go very quickly, but building the > cache takes time during each add or modify operation. Can't call Redhat as its centos-ds, I screwed up calling it RHDS since they are the same. Thanks for the help Ill try a few other things. >>>> There are about 500k objects in the directory currently and its >>>> broken down in a hierarchical format. >>>> A simple ASCII drawing would be. >>>> >>>> ou=top >>>> | >>>> - ou=First >>>> | >>>> + ou=Second >>>> | >>>> + cn=Final >>>> >>>> >>>> This is representation of the data but for ease of explanation this >>>> should work. >>>> >>>> There are lots of "First" object and they have the possibility of >>>> lots of "second" objects. Its the also the same for "Second" object >>>> they could have a lot of "Final" objects. The idea is to use CoS >>>> at the First and Second level to reduce the amount look ups and >>>> redundant data as final objects need some info from the second >>>> objects and first objects. >>>> Hopefully I explained that in a way it is easy to understand. >>>> >>>> My question is are CoS objects not supposed to be used this way? >>>> Also are lots of CoS objects used in a hierarchical tree this way >>>> bad? Is there a way to make these imports faster? And last am I >>>> just doing something completely wrong and there is a better way >>>> that I should work to my end goal. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Edward >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 389 users mailing list >>>> 389-users at redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >> >
