It should be indexed for PRESENCE in order for this search to be indexed. I think it is indexed on equality in your case. 2009/4/21 James Chavez <james.chavez at sanmina-sci.com> > Hello List, > I have a directory with 20,000 plus users. > The output from logconv is showing me that I have unindexed searches with a > search filter of '(uidNumber=*)'. > However my uidNumber attribute is indeed indexed. > > The documentation states the following > " In Directory Server, when examining an index, if more than a certain > number of entries are found, the server stops reading the index and marks > the search as unindexed for that particular index." > > I believe this is what is going on because if i increase the > idlistscanlimit the searches no longer show as unindexed. > > So a few questions. > Is this a serious warning or error and does it effect performance? It seems > to me that it renders the indexes useless for directories with more than > 4,000 entries unless the idlistscanlimit is increased. > > Can I increase it only for the uidNumber or chosen attributes attributes? I > am assuming the answer to this is no since it seems to be set globally. > > Is there a tool similar to OpenLDAP's slapindex utility to maintain index > integrity in FDS or is it not necessary? > > Thank you > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20090421/637c1a0c/attachment.html
