Jared B. Griffith wrote: > Thanks, just wanted to make sure. > I assume replication agreements are set up the same way as they were > on 1.0.4 Yes. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins at redhat.com> > To: "Jared B. Griffith" <jared.griffith at farheap.com>, "General > discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." > <fedora-directory-users at redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 3:11:32 PM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles > Subject: Re: Mixing Directory Servers > > Jared B. Griffith wrote: > > Is it possible to build and install a 1.1 instance and make it a slave > > of a 1.0.4 insstance? > Yes. Replication works fine from 1.1 to 1.0.4 and vice versa. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > -- > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080131/597f6e32/attachment.bin
