Ken Marsh wrote: > Rich, > > Thanks for all your effort. > > I always chose "2", some customization, for all install efforts. Should > I be choosing 3? > If it seems to have problems if you use 2, then use 3. > No errors were logged anywhere, on either server, only the message from > ./setup/setup that the Admin hadn't started. > Fedora DS 1.0.4 setup error logging is just bad. Fedora DS 1.1 is much, much better, and it's all in perl so if you are a perl hacker you can easily figure out what's going on. > I also got to the point where the new server was recognized by the old > server's admin, but when I tried to manage it, I just got an error that > a .jar couldn't be downloaded. > What was the exact error? You can use startconsole -D to get more information. > -Ken. > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080109/410ce227/attachment.bin
