FDS 1.1 Transport endpoint is not connected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Richard, I?ll give connection management a whirl.

Here?s the log parser output (nice util btw):

----------- Access Log Output ------------

Restarts:                     0

Total Connections:            4820
Peak Concurrent Connections:  19
Total Operations:             18017
Total Results:                18129
Overall Performance:          100.0%

Searches:                     9960
Modifications:                6
Adds:                         0
Deletes:                      0
Mod RDNs:                     0

Persistent Searches:          0
Internal Operations:          0
Entry Operations:             0
Extended Operations:          3224
Abandoned Requests:           0
Smart Referrals Received:     0

VLV Operations:               0
VLV Unindexed Searches:       0
SORT Operations:              0
SSL Connections:              1613

Entire Search Base Queries:   820
Unindexed Searches:           0

FDs Taken:                    4828
FDs Returned:                 4817
Highest FD Taken:             109

Broken Pipes:                 0
Connections Reset By Peer:    0
Resource Unavailable:         17
     -  17   (T1) Idle Timeout Exceeded

Binds:                        4827
Unbinds:                      65

 LDAP v2 Binds:               0
 LDAP v3 Binds:               4827
 SSL Client Binds:            0
 Failed SSL Client Binds:     0
 SASL Binds:                  0

 Directory Manager Binds:     0
 Anonymous Binds:             4813
 Other Binds:                 14



On 2/15/08 12:23 PM, "Rich Megginson" <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:

> Richard Hesse wrote:
>> Eh sorry about this but it appears that my original hunch was correct.
>> The 1.1 DS instance did indeed hang again recently. I was able to
>> check a localhost query and that failed, too. So the problem
>> definitely appears to be a hang in the FDS code somewhere. The
>> question is, how do I go about debugging this? Strace doesn?t show
>> much at all. Enabling debug trace logging kills the server. Any ideas?
>> Thanks.
> What sort of application(s) are you using to generate a load against the
> directory server?
>
> What does logconv.pl /var/log/dirsrv/slapd-instance/access say?
>
> If TRACE level logging is too expensive, you might try 8 Connection
> management
> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#Troubleshooting
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux