Thank you for information. I have fixed the issue finally once i run the authconfig and configured ldap server details. Now i have a problem! when i try to add windows clinet machine in FDS it give a error message. fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com wrote: Send Fedora-directory-users mailing list submissions to fedora-directory-users at redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-directory-users-request at redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-directory-users-owner at redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Fedora-directory-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within the same domain (Daryle A. Tilroe) 2. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within the same domain (Richard Megginson) 3. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within the same domain (Daryle A. Tilroe) 4. Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within the same domain (Richard Megginson) 5. Regarding fds with samba (surendhar surya) 6. No X (Vampire D) 7. Re: Regarding fds with samba (Ivan Ferreira) 8. Re: No X (Richard Megginson) 9. add new customer to Quickbooks from Directory Server (Darren Fulton - CTI) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:30:11 -0600 From: "Daryle A. Tilroe" Subject: Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within the same domain To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." Message-ID: <46926293.2070806 at micralyne.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Joel Heenan wrote: > On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 00:14 +1000, Richard Megginson wrote: > >>How did you create your directory server instances? Usually the first >>one you create is your Configuration Directory Server, the one the >>console uses as sort of a network registry (the o=NetscapeRoot suffix). >>Subsequent directory server instance creation should use this one >>instead of creating a new Config DS. The setup program should give you >>these options. I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up with things messed up. I have not yet tried again but was curious if there was a 'correct' method. Otherwise I was just going to have the two be independent insofar as the config DB went. I require this so either will be completely, and indefinitely, functional when the other is down. -- Daryle A. Tilroe ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:29:19 -0600 From: Richard Megginson Subject: Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within the same domain To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." Message-ID: <4692625F.2030205 at redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Daryle A. Tilroe wrote: > Joel Heenan wrote: > >> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 00:14 +1000, Richard Megginson wrote: >> >>> How did you create your directory server instances? Usually the >>> first one you create is your Configuration Directory Server, the one >>> the console uses as sort of a network registry (the o=NetscapeRoot >>> suffix). Subsequent directory server instance creation should use >>> this one instead of creating a new Config DS. The setup program >>> should give you these options. > > I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple > dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers > for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up > with things messed up. How so? > I have not yet tried again but was curious > if there was a 'correct' method. Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the config DS are hard coded, and there is not really a provision for specifying more than one for failover. > Otherwise I was just going to have > the two be independent insofar as the config DB went. I require > this so either will be completely, and indefinitely, functional when > the other is down. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070709/c3cda3ee/smime.bin ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:52:05 -0600 From: "Daryle A. Tilroe" Subject: Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within the same domain To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." Message-ID: <469267B5.6090607 at micralyne.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Richard Megginson wrote: > Daryle A. Tilroe wrote: > >> I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple >> dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers >> for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up >> with things messed up. > > How so? It was a couple weeks ago but IIRC the admin server on the second master would not run properly. I will really have to try it again to confirm. >> I have not yet tried again but was curious >> if there was a 'correct' method. > > Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the config > DS are hard coded, and there is not really a provision for specifying > more than one for failover. So basically I should have my two multimasters run independent admin servers? I did notice that I can admin the other "independent" secondary master with the 'left over' entry in the config DB of the primary (it was left there after I redid the secondary since the I left the primary). This suggests I could probably add each of the two master to each other's config DB manually. I'm not really sure that this is even useful though in a small install. Probably best to leave them as separate admin servers with the userRoot replicated; that seems to work just fine. -- Daryle A. Tilroe ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:49:07 -0600 From: Richard Megginson Subject: Re: Admin Server connecting to two Directory Servers within the same domain To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." Message-ID: <46926703.1040305 at redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Daryle A. Tilroe wrote: > Richard Megginson wrote: > >> Daryle A. Tilroe wrote: >> >>> I have a closely related question. Is there a correct way in a simple >>> dual multimaster setup to have the two servers both be config servers >>> for the same DB? I tried just replicating NetscapeRoot but I ended up >>> with things messed up. >> >> How so? > > It was a couple weeks ago but IIRC the admin server on the second > master would not run properly. I will really have to try it again > to confirm. > >>> I have not yet tried again but was curious >>> if there was a 'correct' method. >> >> Not really. There are too many places where the host:port of the >> config DS are hard coded, and there is not really a provision for >> specifying more than one for failover. > > So basically I should have my two multimasters run independent admin > servers? I did notice that I can admin the other "independent" > secondary master with the 'left over' entry in the config DB of > the primary (it was left there after I redid the secondary since > the I left the primary). This suggests I could probably add each > of the two master to each other's config DB manually. Yes, you could do that too. > I'm not really > sure that this is even useful though in a small install. Probably > best to leave them as separate admin servers with the userRoot > replicated; that seems to work just fine. > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070709/a50e6030/smime.bin ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:15:46 +0100 (BST) From: surendhar surya Subject: Regarding fds with samba To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com Message-ID: <89864.12273.qm at web8903.mail.in.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I have installed fedora directory server and i tried to integreate with samba. When i tried to groupmap using this command. I get a error message. what will be the problem. can anyone provide me a solution.? [root at fds ~]# net groupmap add rid=512 ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup="Domain Admins" Can't lookup UNIX group Domain Admins Thanks and Regard Surendhar P Chennai --------------------------------- Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/4b014e42/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:08:13 -0400 From: "Vampire D" Subject: No X To: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com Message-ID: <4ca8a4870707100808o12705142me70ea9af5cbf7a13 at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Is there anything you cannot do with FDS when using the HTTP Control Panel rather than using the X Windows Java Control Panel? Is it highly recommended to use the X Windows Java Control Panel in production? -- "Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look just like the criminal they are playing?" Christopher -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/3bf15536/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:22:30 -0400 From: Ivan Ferreira Subject: Re: Regarding fds with samba To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." Cc: fedora-directory-users at redhat.com, fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 You have to creaete the "Domain Admins" Unix Group (PosixGroup) in the Directory Server. If you already created id, check if you can list the group with: getent group If you cannot see the "Domain Admins" unix group, then you have a problem with your LDAP client conrfuration, check ldap.conf. Para fedora-directory-users at redhat.co m surendhar surya cc .in> Asunto Enviado por: fedora-directory-users-b Regarding fds with samba ounces at redhat.com Clasificaci?n Uso Interno 10/07/2007 06:15 a.m. Por favor, responda a "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." redhat.com> I have installed fedora directory server and i tried to integreate with samba. When i tried to groupmap using this command. I get a error message. what will be the problem. can anyone provide me a solution.? [root at fds ~]# net groupmap add rid=512 ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup="Domain Admins" Can't lookup UNIX group Domain Admins Thanks and Regard Surendhar P Chennai Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download. -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users ======================================================================================== AVISO LEGAL: Esta informaci?n es privada y confidencial y est? dirigida ?nicamente a su destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario original de este mensaje y por este medio pudo acceder a dicha informaci?n por favor elimine el mensaje. La distribuci?n o copia de este mensaje est? estrictamente prohibida. Esta comunicaci?n es s?lo para prop?sitos de informaci?n y no debe ser considerada como propuesta, aceptaci?n ni como una declaraci?n de voluntad oficial de NUCLEO S.A. La transmisi?n de e-mails no garantiza que el correo electr?nico sea seguro o libre de error. Por consiguiente, no manifestamos que esta informaci?n sea completa o precisa. Toda informaci?n est? sujeta a alterarse sin previo aviso. This information is private and confidential and intended for the recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and shall not be regarded neither as a proposal, acceptance nor as a statement of will or official statement from NUCLEO S.A. . Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice. ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:27:12 -0600 From: Richard Megginson Subject: Re: No X To: "General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project." Message-ID: <4693A550.4060309 at redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Vampire D wrote: > Is there anything you cannot do with FDS when using the HTTP Control > Panel rather than using the X Windows Java Control Panel? The HTTP control panel (aka phonebook/gateway or admin express) just allows limited user/group management, server log viewing, and server start/stop. The Java Control Panel (aka console) allows you do perform all aspects of server, user, and group management. > > Is it highly recommended to use the X Windows Java Control Panel in > production? If you require a management GUI, then yes. All administration can be performed via the command line and via LDAP. > > -- > "Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they > look just like the criminal they are playing?" > > Christopher > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3245 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20070710/2cbdf6dc/smime.bin ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:44:29 -0500 From: Darren Fulton - CTI Subject: add new customer to Quickbooks from Directory Server To: Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com Message-ID: <4693A95D.10409 at concepttechnologyinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Disclaimer: Shot in the dark and possibly off-topic. Situation: We add client contacts to our Fedora Directory Server. The billing department has to also manually add client contacts into Quickbooks to generate bills and such. Goal: Make it so the client contacts only have to be manually added into only one system. Proposed Solutions: Make Quickbooks look for clients in the directory _or_ create a simple way to export from the directory client contact info (I think Quickbooks uses an IIF file). [BTW, wouldn't it be cool if there was a link in Directory Express web app to generate this like the vCard link?] Question for List: Has anybody had any experience getting either of these done that they would like to share? Final Disclaimer: Google searches revealed one or more commercial third-party applications that allow Quickbooks to "integrate" with LDAP. A quick look at these programs didn't impress me, but I have _not_ tested them. Google searches also revealed a Finance::IIF perl module that I will keep in mind. Thank you for any input. -- Best Regards, Darren Fulton Concept Technology, Inc. 1106 17th Avenue South Nashville, TN 37212 Phone - 615.321.6428 Ext. 105 Fax - 615.321.5598 ------------------------------ -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users End of Fedora-directory-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 9 ***************************************************** Thanks and Regard Surendhar P Chennai --------------------------------- 5, 50, 500, 5000. Store N number of mails in your inbox. Click here. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070711/9e10f53a/attachment.html
