Josh Kelley wrote: > On 9/7/06, Richard Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote: >> Josh Kelley wrote: >> > Is this a bug in FDS? Or did I misconfigure something? Is there an >> > easy workaround? >> I'm not sure. Is it the LDAP resultCode that causes the OS X clients to >> fail, or is it the SASL return code? > > I assume it's the LDAP resultCode - the only SASL results that the > client sees appears to be a text error message, and I doubt OS X > bothers to parse that - but I don't know of an easy way to check. I checked RFC 4513 - http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4513.txt - it doesn't say anything about the correct result code to return in this case, other than it is an error if anything other than success or bindinprogress is returned. You might want to ask on ldap at umich.edu or on IRC.freenode.net #ldap if there is a standard that covers this case. > > Josh Kelley > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060907/6c5313d2/attachment.bin
