Philip Kime wrote: > I've just build an LDAP dev server, the same as my prod servers. > However, I can't start the console via HTTPS under X (no problems > under windows). I have the same libraries etc. on my dev box (copied > from PROD, where it works, in fact). I get the "libnss3.s0 not found". > This library is certainly in /opt/fedora-ds/shared/lib, where > LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to in startconsole. I found out why it works on > PROD but not on DEV - this is because /usr/lib/libnss3.s0 exists on > PROD but not on DEV. HOWEVER - why is it looking in /usr/lib when > LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set to look in /opt/fedora-ds/shared/lib? Here is > the output on PROD, where it works: Wow. This is really strange. When I do the same thing on my FDS 1.0.2 installation on FC5, LD_LIBRARY_PATH works. Are you sure you exported LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Try this: [root at hqldap01 ~]# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/fedora-ds/shared/lib ldd /opt/fedora-ds/lib/libjss3.so > > [root at hqldap01 ~]# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH > /opt/fedora-ds/shared/lib > [root at hqldap01 ~]# ldd /opt/fedora-ds/lib/libjss3.so > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) > libnss3.so => /usr/lib/libnss3.so (0xf7f48000) > libsmime3.so => /usr/lib/libsmime3.so (0xf7f28000) > libssl3.so => /usr/lib/libssl3.so (0xf7f08000) > libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0xf7f04000) > libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0xf7f01000) > libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0xf7ed0000) > libjvm.so => not found > libjava.so => not found > libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xf7da5000) > libsoftokn3.so => /usr/lib/libsoftokn3.so (0xf7d3f000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7d2d000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xf7d28000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) > This upsets me as I assumed that it was using the nice new libnss3 > etc. libs from the fedora tree. LD_LIBRARY_PATH seems to be doing > nothing at all. I can't see any SUID/SGID things in there which would > disable LD_LIBRARY_PATH? On DEV, it doesn't work because: > > [root at ldapdev001 ~]# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH > /opt/fedora-ds/shared/lib > [root at ldapdev001 ~]# ldd /opt/fedora-ds/lib/libjss3.so > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) > libnss3.so => not found > libsmime3.so => not found > libssl3.so => not found > libplc4.so => not found > libplds4.so => not found > libnspr4.so => not found > libjvm.so => not found > libjava.so => not found > libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xf7e4a000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56555000) > > Now I'm worried that by PROD servers are using older libraries by > finding them in /usr/lib ... > > PK > > > -- > Philip Kime > NOPS Systems Architect > 310 401 0407 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20060831/bf6a706c/attachment.bin
