Oliver Hookins wrote: > On Mon Oct 30, 2006 at 08:27:54 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote: > >> Oliver Hookins wrote: >> >>> On Sun Oct 15, 2006 at 20:44:44 +1000, Oliver Hookins wrote: >>> >>> >>>> OK well aside from this issue, has anyone got FDS running on RHEL 2.1? >>>> >>>> >>> I guess nobody has... well in any case I've downloaded the dsbuild 1.0.3 >>> tarball and attempted to do a build on RHEL ES 2.1. Not surprisingly, it >>> fails. Can anyone shed some light on these error messages? I started the >>> build with make BUILD_RPM=1 NOJAVA=1 SNMP_SOURCE=1 >>> >>> >> I'm not sure, but it looks like a glibc compatability issue. You might >> have to install some sort of gcc or glibc compat package. On the other >> hand, it may require a newer version of gcc/glibc than AS 2.1 has. >> > > Most of the errors suggest it is looking for GLIBC 2.0 and 2.1 procedures, > while the system has GLIBC 2.2.4 installed. I installed the compat-glibc > package which has 2.1 but including this in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH first causes > make to bail out because it requires 2.2 and apparently it gives up at the > first libc file it examines. > Maybe there is a compat-make? > If there is no way around this particular thing, perhaps your suggestion of > using a later version of GLIBC will be the answer. Is there an easy way to > signal dsbuild to statically link GLIBC or will it require editing a lot of > files? > I have no idea. This is highly not-recommended to do. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3178 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20061030/f5f4f9c0/attachment.bin
